To: freedom44
Tree rings show that vegetation growth slowed down in around 207BC, possibly because of the nuclear winter effect of dust blotting out the sun. So did this happen after Tunguska, as well?
4 posted on
10/17/2004 3:39:00 PM PDT by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: atomicpossum
So did this happen after Tunguska, as well? Well... no.
No trace has been found at Tunguska of any remnants of the object, that I know of. The conclusion is that the object "vaporized" and no traces struck earth.
16 posted on
10/17/2004 3:57:10 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: atomicpossum
Sorry, Tunguska was an air burst, albeit a very spectacular one.
Can you imagine if something similar were to happen today, especially over a populated area?
To: atomicpossum
They think the Russian hit was an air burst or glancing blow. The object didn't hit the earth, just the shock wave. Its the impact that throws back up the dust. Because of that there was no large scale blockage of the sun.
19 posted on
10/17/2004 4:08:52 PM PDT by
PeteB570
To: atomicpossum
So did this happen after Tunguska, as well? No...
Tunguska occurred at the turn of the century, approx. 1900 CE... 100 years ago..
Roman Comet happened approx. 2,200 years ago.. 200-250 BCE..
Even at 2,200 years ago, that would make it one of the most recent major asteroid /comet impacts in history..
22 posted on
10/17/2004 5:12:45 PM PDT by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson