Replies

Bill Clinton was a pandering criminal who only did anything when it was popular or benifitted Bill Clinton. All Democratic politicians who refused to stand between him and the nation are cowardly weasels, accomplices. The differences in todays candidates are stark. Senator Kerry supported the Communist leader Daniel Oretga, he even went to Central America and met with him, he met with the North Vietamese, the enemy in Paris, he supported a nuclear freeze in Europe that would have froze in favor of the USSR, he voted against removing Saddam Hussein's army from Kuwaitt. If Kerry would have had his way then, Iraq would be in Saudi Arabia now, we'd be in a server oil drought, there would be real STARVATION in America's inner cities, the food is brought in by trucks that only run on fuel derived from oil. George Bush is a proven leader. His economic policies work, our enemies die over there, we have not been attacked at home in over 3 years.

The one thing I wish Bush would do is follow a Reaganesque example and cause a shift in voter thinking. The nation doesn't need to be a 50/50 split, a well articulated president could cause a voter shift and decimate dem support that would bring about a severe crisis for the dem party and possibly split the left from them.

The left would only have the green party to run to and would then achieve terminal irrelevance.

This election should be 80/20 for Bush..

If people only voted the way they live and raise their children.
Ignore the man behind the curtain with false promises..

It's impossible to know what this writer is talking about, since it's an excerpt and the rest of the article is available only by subscription.

It appears the writer thinks Bush will lose because he didn't prepare the country for some unidentified change. But who knows?