Skip to comments.
DRUDGE SIREN: KERRY/EDWARDS ELECTION DIRECTIVE: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS!
Drudge ^
| 10/14/04
| Drudge
Posted on 10/14/2004 7:55:37 AM PDT by Pete
Edited on 10/14/2004 10:48:42 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 14, 2004 10:58:04 ET XXXXX
DNC ELECTION MANUAL: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS
**World Exclusive**
The Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee are advising election operatives to declare voter intimidation -- even if none exists, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.
A 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee states: "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"
[HIGHLIGHT OF ELECTION DAY MANUAL, NOVEMBER 2004. CLICK FOR IMAGE .JPG FILE]
The provocative Dem battle plan is to be distributed in dozens of states, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
One top DNC official confirmed the manual's authenticity, but claimed the notion of crying wolf on any voter intimidation is "absurd."
"We all know the Republicans are going to try to steal the election by scaring people and confusing people," the top DNC source explained.
Developing...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionfraud; 2004votefraud; ambulancechasers; breakinghard; dirtytricks; dnc; dnctalkingpoints; election; electionfraud; goebbelswouldbeproud; howtostealanelection; intimidation; kerry; kerrystrategy; lawsuitabuse; lawsuits; loserpays; lyingliars; lyingrats; napalminthemorning; nothingfollows; rats; rattricks; smearcampaign; thebiglie; tortreform; votefraud; voterfraud; voterintimidation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-423 next last
1
posted on
10/14/2004 7:55:37 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: Pete
2
posted on
10/14/2004 7:56:33 AM PDT
by
danneskjold
(All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
To: Pete
3
posted on
10/14/2004 7:56:38 AM PDT
by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: Pete
SSDD. Hopefully the election will be by a landslide, which will make all the legal chicanery moot.
4
posted on
10/14/2004 7:56:46 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Pete
These criminals simply cannot win. My sense of decency prevents me from believing that they will.
On the other hand, Bill Clinton.......
5
posted on
10/14/2004 7:56:54 AM PDT
by
Shadowfax
To: Pete
this is news?
but what our side should be doing is - CHARGE DEM VOTER FRAUD. because in most cases, it DOES exist.
6
posted on
10/14/2004 7:57:29 AM PDT
by
oceanview
To: Pete
Will not be reported in the MSM...the most this will get is 2 mins from the grapevine on Brit.
To: Pete
In other words, "lie".
Let's not hold our breath waiting for the MSM to cover this sleaze from the dems either.
8
posted on
10/14/2004 7:57:45 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Pete
More -
"The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained a 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee... "
To: Pete
Rats, launch your BS attack now because there is not going to be any voter intimidation.
11
posted on
10/14/2004 7:58:11 AM PDT
by
demlosers
( ONI: “Lieutenant Kerry wasn’t cleared to know what time it was!”)
12
posted on
10/14/2004 7:58:22 AM PDT
by
meema
To: Pete
They've been outed and this document will serve to erase any and all efforts to claim trouble where none exists.
BWAHHHHHHAHAHA!!!
Terry McAwful must be having a s#%t fit right now.
To: Pete
And we're off!
How in the world does Drudge get these things. There must be some serious moles at the DNC or could it be, there are honorable people there who don't appreciate being tied to a creep like Kerry..
Inquiring minds want to know..
14
posted on
10/14/2004 7:58:44 AM PDT
by
DSBull
(Leather Belts, with Liberal logic everywhere they are keeping my head from exploding)
To: Pete
Hugh Hewitt is correct - If its not close they can't cheat.
15
posted on
10/14/2004 7:58:52 AM PDT
by
smag499
To: Motherbear
Yeah, but I don't think anyone expected to have documentary evidence of Democrats' intent to cheat.
16
posted on
10/14/2004 7:58:53 AM PDT
by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: Shadowfax
Isn't this illegal interfering with an election?
17
posted on
10/14/2004 7:59:12 AM PDT
by
thomas16
To: Pete
This is it. This is how it starts. This election is going to be a war.
18
posted on
10/14/2004 7:59:13 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
(Laffer curve: decreasing tax rates increases tax revenue.)
To: DSBull
I hope he didn't get it from Mary Mapes....
19
posted on
10/14/2004 7:59:13 AM PDT
by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: Shadowfax
"On the other hand, Bill Clinton......."
The worst part is the fact that I would vote for Clinton over Kerry if the choice were forced on me.
20
posted on
10/14/2004 7:59:17 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The economy won't matter if you're dead.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-423 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
![[HIGHLIGHT OF ELECTION DAY MANUAL, NOVEMBER 2004. CLICK FOR IMAGE .JPG FILE]](dnc.jpg){kind=link}