Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; ...

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.


2 posted on 10/10/2004 8:22:44 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; Prost1; PatrickHenry

I would suggest that their timing is off. They say the European group of Amerindians came between "15,000 and 30,000 years ago" depending on methodology. My guess is the 30,000 years is the date using the assumptions they used for all of the other numbers (including the date of 144,000 for Adam and Eve and the date of 50,000 for humans leaving Africa). They gave BOTH dates for the group of Amerindians because 30K sounds WAY too far in the past to match the facts. Even 15K is stretching it, unless this was the first group of humans in the new world.

If that is the case, then many of the dates in this article can be sliced in half and still fit the data. That makes all of this pretty darned recent.


13 posted on 10/10/2004 9:20:57 PM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson