Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
Lincoln has repeatedly maintained that she believes marriage should be between one man and one woman. Lincoln spokesman Drew Goesl said that the senator believes the legal definition of marriage should be left up to each state as it historically has been.

Sounds good...until you realize that states which don't agree with gay marriage will be forced to recognize such 'marriages' performed in states which allow it.
17 posted on 10/09/2004 7:05:55 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Frumious Bandersnatch; sweetliberty

You got it Fruminous- and Jim Holt says it at about every stop, but the press never seems to get around to reporting it.

Lincoln is being deceptive when she claims she is for marriage because she "supports" the state amendment but opposes the federal. She knows very well that all state amendments will be no protection at all when the federal courts throw them out.

We must have a federal amendment to keep the courts from shoving homosexual "marriage" down America's throat. Lincoln knows it, Holt says it, but the papers won't print that simple statement regardless of how often Holt repeats it. They make it seem like he is making a big deal over nothing, since slippery Lincoln "supports" the state amendment.


18 posted on 10/09/2004 8:50:58 PM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson