I'm old enough to remember the voter fraud (tombstones in Chicago voting) in 1960 that gave the election to JFK. Nixon could have, but did not protest it.
Nixon had enough class to walk away, or was it timidity? Anyway, that was nowhere near as blatant as things are now.
A single states' corrupt activities is the reason why the electorial college was established. The only way to override the EC's effectiveness is to corrupt multiple states to the same side. The founders couldn't conceive of a scenario in that scale.
Today I fear we have party-wide corruption that dwarfs anything Nixon was up against and aimed directly at circumventing those checks and balances of the electorial college.
Nixon's Chi town discovery is technologically dwarfed by the West Palm Beach nationally televised recount fraud. The under-reported military vote scandal, etc., etc.
Our MSM has to have been surpressing any big news in fighting this if there really had been any! But OTOH, we could all be losing it while Dubya actually has a handle on it.
But we don't know! And that's not good.