Skip to comments.
Hetch Hetchy could be drained
The Fresno Bee ^
| September 28, 2004
| Mark Grossi
Posted on 09/28/2004 9:01:05 PM PDT by Plutarch
Bay Area water could be stored at Don Pedro Reservoir downstream, according to a new study.
By Mark Grossi
The Fresno Bee
For less than $2 billion, San Francisco could drain its drinking water out of a glacial valley in Yosemite National Park.
That's the bottom line in the most detailed study yet on the controversial topic of restoring Hetch Hetchy Valley, where a 117 billion-gallon reservoir has submerged nature since the 1920s.
The basic idea: capture San Francisco's share of the Tuolumne River farther downstream in Don Pedro Reservoir.
The study, presented Monday by the national advocacy group Environmental Defense, is billed as the first serious starting point for restoration.
"I think people would be surprised to find out that Don Pedro could supply 96% of the water Hetch Hetchy provides," said analyst Spreck Rosecrans.
The study will likely cause ripples in San Francisco, a city known for supporting environmental campaigns, such as San Joaquin River revival, but resisting Hetch Hetchy restoration. Mayor Gavin Newsom took no position on the study.
Restore Hetchy Hetchy link
(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: damremoval; environment; water; yosemite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
San Francisco swarms with environmentalists, who would go to the barricades to prevent drilling in the ANWR, but are perfectly happy with getting their water from a reservoir flooding another Yosemite valley!
1
posted on
09/28/2004 9:01:06 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
2
posted on
09/28/2004 9:02:09 PM PDT
by
Drango
(NPR-When government funds a "news" outlet that has a bias...it's no longer news...it's propaganda.)
To: farmfriend
To: Plutarch
Looks like a nice place for a lake to me.
4
posted on
09/28/2004 9:06:00 PM PDT
by
hyperpoly8
(Illegitimati Non Carborundum)
To: Plutarch
Nicely shows their true agenda, doesn't it...
5
posted on
09/28/2004 9:06:13 PM PDT
by
kenth
(Tucking tail and running is not an exit strategy, it's cowardice and surrender.)
To: Plutarch
The first person I remember proposing to restore the Hetch Hetchy and undo the environmental damage there was George H.W. Bush.
6
posted on
09/28/2004 9:08:36 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
To: Plutarch
You know, I can't understand how the environmentalists can oppose drilling in our backyard, but it's ok to do it half way around the world.
7
posted on
09/28/2004 9:10:19 PM PDT
by
T Minus Four
(Proud to live in Utah - a WHOLE state.)
To: Redcloak
Is that right? I'd love to see a reference to his proposal, if you know where to find it.
I was in Yosemite this summer and I would love to see Hetch Hetchy restored.
8
posted on
09/28/2004 9:15:01 PM PDT
by
Piranha
To: Redcloak
You are correct.
Dam Hetch Hetchy! As well dam for water-tanks the peoples cathedrals and churches, for no holier temple has ever been consecrated by the heart of man.
John Muir, 1912
To: Plutarch
The basic idea: capture San Francisco's share of the Tuolumne River farther downstream in Don Pedro Reservoir.
Hey everyone, I just saw an endangered field mouse right on the edge of the Don Pedro Reservoir. I wouldn't raise that water level one iota. Matter of fact, I think it should be drained to establish more habitat for this mouse and his endangered friends.
To: Piranha
I remember this proposal from the Bush41 years, but it turns out that the idea first surfaced during the last years of the Reagan administration. SECINT Don Hodel proposed restoring the Hetch Hetchy in
1987. Hodel continued as SECINT under G.H.W.Bush. I remember the enviralists standing around with their beebers stuned not knowing which way to turn.
11
posted on
09/28/2004 9:36:45 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Vikings plundered my last tag line.)
To: Redcloak
Also, GHWB raised San Francisco's "rent" on Hetch Hetchy from a mere $30,000 a year to $8 million.
This story. DiFi screamed, but it was still a cheap deal. The idea was that if we charged SF something close to the real cost they might stop freeloading off the rest of the U.S. and pony up for an alternative.
To: Redcloak
I understand that both Feinstein and Boxer are opposed to rescuing Hetch Hetchy. That in itself is a reason to support it.
13
posted on
09/28/2004 9:45:37 PM PDT
by
Piranha
To: Plutarch
Hetch Hetchy will not be drained so forget about it.
14
posted on
09/28/2004 9:47:09 PM PDT
by
telebob
To: Billthedrill
I read that Gifford Pinchot won John Muir's enmity when he endorsed damming Hetch Hetchy. Of course Pinchot is one of the great heroes of the environmentalist left...there is a Gifford Pinchot National Forest in Washington State.
To: Plutarch
If I remember correctly, the plan is to raise the height of Don Pedro Reservoir quite a bit so it can become a replacement for the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. It won't be cheap though: you have to factor in the cost of dismantling the Hetch Hetchy dam, restoring the valley behind it, and upgrading the dam on Don Pedro Reservoir--all of which will cost US$10 billion total.
It would take several decades up to a century to restore the Hetch Hetchy Valley to its form before the dam was built.
To: Piranha
Is that right? I'd love to see a reference to his proposal, if you know where to find it. There is a link in the original post, above the photograph.
17
posted on
09/28/2004 10:08:56 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
To: RayChuang88
I would imagine it has been filled with silt. do they think they would remove that?
To: Plutarch
For less than $2 billion, San Francisco could drain its drinking water out of a glacial valley in Yosemite National Park. The greenies could take up a collection. Or they could wait 1,000 tears or so.
20
posted on
09/28/2004 10:40:16 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson