Posted on 09/25/2004 7:08:18 PM PDT by Bob J
Edited on 09/25/2004 7:57:22 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Well, after two weeks in which conservative bloggers and conservative posters on conservative fora like FreeRepublic disprove a major media fraud and nearly bring down a sitting anchorman (and when I say "nearly," I just mean we're not done yet), the New York Times decides to write a big Sunday Magazine article about bloggers.
About FreeRepublic, that started the ball rolling?
About PowerLine, that greatly advanced the story in those first hours?
About LGF, who proved the documents to be forgeries within hours of seeing them by just posting an MS Word copy of the text on his site?
Oh, no.
You might think that those might be the bloggers the NYTimes would talk to-- you know, the ones actually making news.
But you'd be wrong.
In the first clear victory for the blogosphere over the legacy media, the New York Times decides to spend ten pages talking about...
Daily Kos, Josh Marshall, and Wonkette.
Gee, PowerLine LGF refuted a 60 Minutes story and put the entire CBS News organization in a state of crisis, and Wonkette tells dick-jokes (bad ones, actually). Who's more newsworthy?
Why, Wonkette, of course.
It's unbelievable. Instapundit gets a brief mention, Kaus gets a paragraph, FreeRepublic gets one passing reference, and then back to Kos, Marshall, Wonkette.
Left-wing politics are thriving on blogs the way Rush Limbaugh has dominated talk radio, and in the last six months, the angrier, nastier partisan blogs have been growing the fastest.
Hey, have you seen my sitemeter lately? How about Allah's? How about PowerLine's? How about LGF's? How about Bill from INDC's?
The reporter likes to rattle off the names of leftist blogs that aren't very high on the traffic or link lists:
Moulitsas was in Section 320, and so was Armstrong from MyDD, Atrios of Eschaton, Zoe from Gadflyer, Jesse and Ezra, Jeralyn of Talkleft, Dave Pell from Electablog, Chris Rabb from Afro-Netizen, Bill Scher from Liberal Oasis and Christian Crumlish of radiofreeblogistan.
...but apparently feels that mentioning Instapundit and FreeRepublic constitutes sufficient exposure of the right side of the blogosphere... you know, the side that's actually making all the news lately.
But there is no liberal media bias.
None. At. All.
It's just their damn phones. Their phones are biased. They just don't have any right-leaning numbers on them, like the archconservative "6" or vaguely fascist "8."
Tomorrow's Headlines, Today:
WASHINGTON POST: Under Cloud, Dan Rather Resigns; "New Media" Claims Triumph
NEW YORK TIMES: The Irrepressible Wonkette Makes Hilarious "Don't Go There" Reference While Discussing Paris Hilton.
Bad link.
If they give honorable mention to FR they know they're doomed.
I don't like the F word. I guess I am just old fashioned,
Its a shame, but its no surprise.
I second your remark. I don't like it either.
The Communist media is in trouble in this country. They know it. They are just now figuring out that America is not a socialist/communist country --- and now they are going to pay for it.
How would Cuba do with 10 big newspapers moving in on it??? Possible solution to replacing the socialist media in this country with REAL NESWPAPERS AND MEDIA that is American in purpose and objective.
Radical concept, I know ---
Get a clue! We don't use that language on this sight! We're not all truckers and carpenters ya know. I believe there is even more than a coupla ladies! Where are your manners?
Part of the reason that the article was so biased towards the liberal blogs is because the NYTimes is the Ted Kennedy of the press. This is expected but inexcusable behavior on the Times' part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.