Posted on 09/24/2004 10:49:26 AM PDT by mark502inf
Except that far more serbs were slaughtered than muslims and Croats...
Yeah its ok to murder Christians apparently.
Its not OK to murder anyone.
Tell that to Bill Clinton and Crazy Clark, they were the ones dropping bombs on Christians to protect Muslims.
We should have stood alongside the Serbs...
Clinton chose poorly.
The Serbs gave blood and treasure for us in WW2...
look how they have been repaid :-(
The whole affair was and still is a blot on the honor of the
United States..
Jesus wept.
I say again, murder is wrong. And if you think that the mass murder of anyone--even Muslims-- is part of professing Christianity, than you are wrong as well. BTW, what religion was Milosevic? I'll give you a hint--do a search and see what the Patriarch of the Serbian Orthodox church says about good old Slobo.
Then "we" would have been murderers as well. Don't let your antipathy for Islam put you in league with war criminals. There is a reason that the policy of the United States under President Bush and Secretary Powell is to hold Serbia at arm's length until they turn in the leaders responsible for these crimes.
The Serbs gave blood and treasure for us in WW2
As did most of the rest of Europe that fought against the Nazis; to include France and the Soviet Union. As did Serbia's neighbors Greece and Albania. Are you saying we should ignore war crimes based on WWII alliances?
Clinton chose poorly.
Yes he did in many things and there is a legitimate argument that we should not have got involved at all. But to say that we should have helped the Serbs--as the story above reflects, they didn't need any help and we didn't need to be an accomplice to warcrimes.
Which is what we became when we threw in on the side of known criminal narcotics traffickers, white slavers, kidnappers, murders, and insurectionist terrorists.
Another point of light in Clintoon's legacy.
I can only imagine how the Islamonazi apologists will be crowing about this for days...then questions will be raised about who is really buried in these graves and we won't hear much more from them.
B) Those nmbes are lower then what was recorded during the Clinton 90s.
It's the Muslim groups which make these claims though we don't hear the outcome or ever get a list of NAMES.
Where are the results of WHO they are from the earlier find?
I think they could be Serbs slaughtered in this area of Bosnia (eastern Bosnia) in WWI and WWII where there were great slaughters by the Austrians, Bosnians, Croats, and Germans.
Those elements are present with every side in the Balkans. For example, in the State Department Human Trafficking Report, Serbia and Croatia both rank worse than Albania and Bosnia. And while the Serbs and Albanians do not like each other, they have a great spirit of cooperation when it comes to narcotics smuggling. The famous "Balkans Route" goes through Macedonia and Serbia proper as well as Kosovo and Albania. As for murders and kidnappings, the article speaks for itself.
The whole article does nothing but insinuate for Muslim propaganda.
Stella Jatras knows a former policeman from California, L.C., who was tasked to find Muslim graves back in 1997/1998. He said that EACH AND EVERY TIME the victims turned out to be Serb soldiers shot in the back of their heads and with their arms tied behind them. Each and every time. He was told to shut up by his superiors when he pointed out the initial ANNOUNCEMENT and hype of suspected Muslims graves turned out to be the graves of Serbs.
There's a coverup when Serbs are found.
The bones in the photo look much older than from 9 years ago.
SARAJEVO, Bosnia-Herzegovina (AP) -- Forensic experts have exhumed 249 bodies from a mass grave in northeastern Bosnia containing victims of the country's devastating 1992-95 war, an official said Thursday.
Murat Hurtic, an official with the missing persons commission in the Muslim-Croat part of the country, said exhumations have been completed at the site in the village of Bljeceva, about 90 kilometres northeast of Sarajevo.
Based on the documents and other evidence found on the bodies, most of the dead appeared to be Bosnian Muslims killed in the 1995 massacre in nearby Srebrenica, the worst massacre of civilians in Europe since the Second World War, he said.
The remains will undergo DNA analysis in an attempt to identify them. The site is a so-called secondary grave, where bodies initially buried elsewhere were dumped in an effort to hide them, Hurtic said.
Over the years, UN and local forensic experts in Bosnia have exhumed 16,500 bodies from more than 300 mass graves. Thousands of people remain missing following the war.
About 250,000 people were killed and 2.2 million driven from their homes during the ethnic conflict, which pitted Bosnia's Muslims, Croats and Serbs against each other.
Cohen told all of us that there was over 100,000 in mass graves. We both know this to be a lie.
Let see if you can follow this, from your own posting:
...most of the dead appeared to be Bosnian Muslims...What that translates to is that some of the dead are NOT Bosnian Muslims. Of course, you already knew that...
I still don't understand why you are so sympathetic to Slobo and the other Serbian communists who murdered their own people by the hundreds. Good bye to Yugo. America should get the will together more often to help people attacked by their own government be they communists or Islamofacists. "The only good communist is a dead communist." It is the price we pay for being the planet's only superpower.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.