Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
"Our work has a margin of error of 17 percent,"

I'd like to know how they derived that margin of error, when DNA technology is promoted as virtually infallible. Maybe they took a bunch of short cuts.

11 posted on 09/22/2004 7:32:42 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

100% sure of the individual fish. not so sure about every fish being sold as red snapper.


20 posted on 09/22/2004 7:53:22 PM PDT by phxaz (for now it's a cold civil war in the usa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It is a function of sample size. Just like the +/- n% you see on polls. For all statistics, larger samples = smaller error; smaller samples = larger error. In this case they only have a sample size of 22 so the error bars are wider.


38 posted on 09/22/2004 9:02:29 PM PDT by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson