Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/21/2004 12:44:14 PM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: imintrouble

Something tells me Madame Parrish is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.


2 posted on 09/21/2004 12:48:39 PM PDT by William Martel (Anyone But Kerry in 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble
I hate it that they spell defense like that.
3 posted on 09/21/2004 12:49:50 PM PDT by Pest (I will choose Free Will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble
"If your comments were crude, vile or threatening: I offer no response. Thank goodness you were part of a very small group..."

What does she mean "thank goodness?" She's a member of the same group. Maybe what she meant to say was:

"If your comments were crude, vile or threatening... then you're my kind of guy!"

4 posted on 09/21/2004 12:50:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble
"c)...It will challenge our mutual enemies to develop more exotic missiles and therefore accelerate the arms race, making us an even greater target for terrorists."

The true colors of this cowardly socialist comes shinning through. Odd, the only country they seem comfortable insulting is the U.S. Could it be because they know we are slow to anger and have a knee jerk button pushing party, unlike the muslims and communists?
6 posted on 09/21/2004 12:52:23 PM PDT by Tweaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble
Based on the serious criticisms of hundreds of scientists, scholars and former U.S. military personnel, one must conclude that the missile defence system, as proposed, will not work.

Notice how libs never ask if domestic programs will "work" right. But military programs are different -- they better be 100% (an impossible standard) or forget about it!

7 posted on 09/21/2004 12:53:39 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble

Dear Canada: In the future, if your lame country needs defending, please ask the coward American draft dodgers whom you insist on honoring, to help you out. Perhaps the French would be willing to defend Quebec. I would not lift a finger, risk one American life or spend one American dollar (about, what, 77 cents to you?) to defend you.


8 posted on 09/21/2004 12:54:01 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against Jean-France Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble

I didn't get a reply. Guess I was one of the crude ones. Though all I said was that I was glad that I had moved out of Canada and had become a U.S. citizen because of people like her.


14 posted on 09/21/2004 1:00:38 PM PDT by somerville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble

Stupid bitch.

If ONE nuclear missile is ever stopped by such a missile defense system, it would be worth it.

The notion that to be safe, a country must leave itself open to nuclear missile attack, is patently absurd.

You can't trust Tyrannical regimes like Iran, North Korea, etc. What planet does this stupid slut live on?

My apologies for any offensive language...


22 posted on 09/22/2004 4:56:36 AM PDT by sargon (How could anyone vote for the socialist, weak-on-defense fraud named John Kerry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson