Posted on 09/19/2004 1:23:19 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
"By 1998, 54% of all AIDS cases in America were homosexual men and 90% of these men acquired HIV through sexual activity."
By 1998, 54% of all AIDS cases in America were homosexual men and 90% of these men acquired HIV through sexual activity"
The historical facts are even worse. In the eighties, the percentage of all Aids cases in the total population were even higher for homosexual males. In fact, the disease spread from the homosexual community into the general population and that lowered the percentage to the 54% figure by 1998.
oh me if I NEVER had to see that word again it would be too soon.....Im SO SICK of homosexual marriage all over the news, news shows showing them kissing and their weddings...why does this HAVE to be front page news ALL THE TIME....it wouldnt be a big deal but it has become one since the clinton administration made them their pets....Rosies ODonnell talking about being a "husband" and such, is about the worst of the worst to me..
Just about any statement you can make about homosexual intercourse defying the design of the body can be made about smoking tobacco, and yet conservatives are the main champions of smokers' rights.
I'm sure many posters will say that the perils of smoking are well publicized, while the perils of homosexuality are not. That's wrong, however: far and away, the number one health threat from homosexual intercourse is AIDS, and that is very well publicized. Any other health problems which are specifically due to homosexual intercourse are minor compared to AIDS, or to the problems caused by smoking.
Any health problems caused by either activity are the result of free and yes, well-informed choices made by the sufferers. Laissez-faire, I say.
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0) |
Homosexual Keyword Search |
"Unfortunately, we have allowed the small, but very vocal, homosexual lobby to characterize AIDS as a political issue instead of a medical issue. Read my tagline."
Thanks for the ping! That deserves yet another Rump Bump!
Truly fascinating.
Not necessarily true. With todays biological tools and research methods, I think it quite likely that the cause and necessary preventives could be developed.
However, the "homosexual community" works actively to prevent any reseach in the area from being carried out.
Buncha liars.
Yes and no - much more likely no. Homosexuality is not caused by genetics or biological criteria:
Click here for more.
For great summary on the issues: How Might Homosexuality Develop? Putting the Pieces Together
Personally, I question the number of AIDS cases spread heterosexually (15%). I bet a large number of those involve bisexual men.
Shilts said in his book that homosexuals in SF gave blood at a very high ratio.
Hmmmm. Much like fake memos, fake science doesn't convince anyone. Just 'cuz you want to believe it doesn't make it true....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.