I don't know about anyone else here, but I find the word "attack" repulsive when someone is merely presenting the truth about someone else --- for example the Swift Boat Vet ads. They are not attacks, they are merely presenting their opinions after being with Kerry in Vietnam, eyewitnesses to his trechery! It is not an attack, in reality it is an exposition of truth and greater perspective.
Just had to say that.
"Fuelled by shadowy cash, the attacks get uglier and uglier.">>>>>>>>>>>>
I thought at first this guy was talking about Move-on.org and George Soros. Nothing more shadowy than a billionaire
who hides his money offshore and uses it to attack an American President. The Swift Boat money isnt shadowy it comes from the small pockets of American patriots.
I agree. "Attack" is a so-called loaded word. It's meant to elicit a negative reaction where one isn't necessarily merited.