Posted on 09/16/2004 11:22:17 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Possible CBS source has had his credibility questioned before
WASHINGTON - Bill Burkett, who has emerged as a possible CBS source for disputed memos about President Bush's Guard service, has a long history of making charges against Bush and the Texas National Guard.
But Burkett's allegations have changed over the years, and have been dismissed as baseless by former Guard colleagues, state legislators and others.
Even Burkett has admitted some of his allegations are false.
Burkett wrote a long indictment against Bush for a Web site in 2003 in which he said he personally was ordered to "alter personnel records of George W. Bush." In that article, Burkett said that when he refused he was sent to Panama as punishment, where he contracted a disabling disease.
But when asked about that charge by the Houston Chronicle in February, Burkett said, "That statement was not accurate, that is overstated."
Burkett, 54, of Baird, Texas, has refused to return calls since the CBS report on Bush's Guard service ran last week.
On Thursday, the Washington Post and the New York Times named Burkett as a possible source for documents CBS used that experts have called fakes. The documents were faxed from a Kinko's in Abilene, the closest commercial copier to Burkett's home in Baird.
The CBS report used documents signed by since-deceased Texas Air National Guard Lt. Col. Jerry Killian to suggest Bush disobeyed a direct order to take a flight physical in 1972.
If Burkett is the source of the CBS documents he must have recently obtained them.
In earlier interviews, he described years of fruitless searching.
One month ago, in an essay posted on a progressive Web site, Burkett theorized that Killian would have been a likely person to know more about Bush's service. But, he conceded, "I have found no documentation from LTC Killian's hand or staff that indicate that this unit was involved in any complicit way to ... cover for the failures of 1Lt. Bush ... " Burkett went on to say, "On the contrary, LTC Killian's remarks are rare."
Several people with connections to the Texas National Guard immediately suspected Burkett was the source of the CBS report last week, and saw it as part of an ongoing vendetta against Bush and the Guard.
Burkett's attorney, David Van Os, said Thursday, "My client has not authorized me to talk about this matter." Van Os issued a statement saying Burkett "no longer trusts any possible outcome of speaking to the press on any issue regarding George W. Bush."
The questions about the CBS documents' authenticity have seemingly overshadowed the larger questions about Bush's Guard service.
CBS anchor Dan Rather on Wednesday conceded there were questions about the authenticity of the documents, but challenged Bush to answer questions about his Guard service. White House spokesman Scott McClellan responded by saying, "It is always best for journalists to stick to reporting the facts and not try to dispense campaign advice."
Questions remain about the documents used by CBS. Experts have said they are fake. Killian's wife and son have said they do not reflect his feelings about Bush, and have called his signature a forgery. Texas Guard officials noted many technical discrepancies that they said cast doubt on the documents.
And Marian Knox, Killian's 86-year-old former secretary, said she never typed the documents and believes they are fake. But Knox said they did reflect concerns Killian had with Bush's Guard service.
Anti-Bush background
If Burkett does prove to be the source of the documents, CBS got them from a man with a well-established history of Bush loathing.
In an article Burkett wrote for the Internet last year he compared Bush to Hitler and Napoleon as one of "the three small men" who sought to rule through tyranny. "Three small men who wanted to conquer and vanquish," Burkett wrote. Burkett confirmed authorship of that article in the February Chronicle interview.
Some of Burkett's friends and associates say they don't know whether he is the CBS source.
Harvey Gough, a Dallas restaurant owner who, like Burkett, fought a legal battle against the Guard, said Thursday, "I can't say he did it or he didn't do it." But Gough said Bush aides such as Karl Rove or Dan Bartlett could have "cooked them up" to trap CBS with a bogus story. That has been denied by Bush officials.
James Moore, co-author of the book Bush's War for Re-Election, which quoted charges made by Burkett, said Thursday, "I know Bill has anger at Bush and the Guard, but I have a difficult time thinking he'd take that kind of risk to fabricate documents."
One person who has heard Burkett's charges against Bush and the Guard over the years is Rep. Bob Hunter, an Abilene Republican who chaired a committee overseeing the Texas Guard. Hunter agreed to let Burkett make charges of favoritism, mismanagement and abuse by the Guard at a legislative hearing in the late 1990s.
Hunter said Thursday he came away unimpressed. "He brought up matters that none of us could believe."
That Burkett's story has changed or evolved over the years is a matter of record.
During Bush's first White House run in 2000, Burkett told reporters he overheard both ends of a phone conversation between former Texas Guard commander Gen. Daniel James III and Bush's one-time Texas chief of staff, Joe Allbaugh, that he said occurred in the summer of 1997. That was similar to what he told Hunter's committee, the lawmaker recalled.
But that claim changed earlier this year.
In February, Burkett said he witnessed documents from Bush's records in a garbage can at a Guard base in Austin.
"My eyes fixed on the first page," he said in an interview in February. "It had Bush, George W. Lt1. What I did next still bothers me. I browsed through the top five or six pages."
Everyone who could have supported the account, including George Conn, the friend who Burkett said took him to the office, said it wasn't true. Allbaugh, now a Washington consultant, called the story "baseless ... hogwash."
Texas Guard officials said no Texas Air Guard records had ever been stored at the facility Burkett named.
Burkett said in interviews earlier this year that his long-standing campaign against the Texas National Guard and Bush began after the Guard failed to provide medical care for him after he contracted a tropical disease in Panama in 1998.
michael.hedges@chron.com
Associated Press The home of Bill Burkett near Baird, Texas, is seen Thursday. Burkett, a retired National Guard officer, has been cited in reports in Newsweek and The New York Times as a source for CBS' report on President Bush's National Guard service. Burkett's lawyer, David Van Os, issued a statement saying Burkett "no longer trusts any possible outcome of speaking to the press on any issue regarding George W. Bush."
I see a shoot out in his near future.
Dan Rather will blame it all on the lack of healthcare - maybe he'll do a "news" story about it. But no one is going to believe anything Dan "reports" anymore.
Kind of like Dan Blather.
BTW, great post!
And I'm saying this not only as a reporter, investigative newsman and editor but I'm also saying this as a consumer of news. Rather blew it - big time.
And folks I've spoken with at CBS agree and are shocked that upper management hasn't pulled Rather off this so-called story and has failed to issue a correction and an apology - if not to President George W. Bush then certainly to the viewers of CBS and those who read it's online sister web site.
The issues involved are not about Rather the man but about Rather the reporter - any reporter. And CBS - or any news outlet.
But, according to Rather, it's a vast conspiracy amongst jealous colleagues that he broke a sensational story, they didn't, and folks aren't interesting in the "news value" of the story itself even if it's based on discredited or otherwise disputed documents.
What a sad set of defenses made worse by Rather's ongoing comments that the focus should not be on him but on Bush who has failed to answer "the charges" contained in the apparently forged and fake documents.
If one of my reporters or editors had said such things I'd tell them flat out they were being dishonest and they were full of BS.
First off, when a reporter breaks what he believes is a big story then the onus is on the reporter and his news outlet to back up what he says. And equally important, before going with the story, to assemble all the pros and cons on a story and report that information in context as best as possible, including in follow up stories.
Consider that, according to press reports, Rather did not reveal in the first report CBS aired that one or more of the experts they had assembled disagreed over the validity of the documents.
Moreover, one or more of the experts were not as expert as Rather suggested, e.g. the experts were not necessarily expert on all aspects of the documents that themselves were several generations of copies thus rendering proof-positive conclusions damn near impossible.
So why wasn't this reported by Rather in the first and second stories?
Also: What basis did Rather have to proclaim, as he did again in the 9/15 60 Minutes II report that even if the documents were fakes, the gist of the contents was accurate and thus Bush did not fulfill his commitments to the National Guard? ...............***Source
Is this Danny Blather's "unimpeachable" source?
Burkett, isn't HTLV a pain? If you think so, don't screw the Panama native girls. The Navy warns you about that, and I bet the ANG and USAF do, too.
Rather's credibility is gone..poof..The libs will love him but no self respecting news organization can stand behind this fraud he perpetrated and that he stands behind.
and FYI
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1218512/posts
Bush Served His Country Without Pay
PoliPundit.com ^ | September 16, 2004 | Oak Leaf
Thank you for the LINK!
The Chronicle would have posted Free Republic as a right wing site, why hide this site's name?
Other reporting by New Media pretty much cinches Burkett as the forger or instigator of the forgery. But, say it ain't so, Dan!! You were so hungry for a scoop to sink Bush that you basically ran with the stuff tossed over your transom. Now, you blame media competitors, Repubs, and demand, yes, demand that the President answer your rude, impertinent questions.
It's pathetic. Shortly, Rather will stand before the world shorn of all dignity, despised by fellow journalists (in this day and age, not just for degrading the profession, but more for damaging the Kerry effort). Next stop: Air America.
"He's very bright; he's not a hayseed," said Royse Kerr, chairman of the Taylor County Democratic Club, which last spring invited Burkett to speak to the members about the "state of politics in America."
Burkett, a retired lieutenant colonel in the Texas National Guard, mentioned then what he had told several reporters last winter -- that he believes Bush aides ordered the destruction of portions of the president's National Guard record because they might have been politically embarrassing. But that was "tangential" to "the framing of his thesis," Kerr said. "What we heard was to demand more honesty of our politicians." .........***
Kudos to the Chronicle. The Washington Post did a ridiculous piece today, basically stating little more than that Burkett is liked by his neighbors.
I think the crux of Rather's "investigation" was to convince this guy to forge documents. I am sure CBS didn't say "forge documents for us." They just listened to him spin his yarns over and over and said "well, if we had documented proof of this..."
The DNC/Kerry link is who put Burkett in touch with CBS.
I suspect that someone contacted Burkett's lawyer, who then put Burkett in touch with CBS. Since they did it through the lawyer, it will be hard to find the DNC/Kerry contact.
I just LINKED that WP stoy above. I quoted the part where they report the Dems in the area regard him as a statesman.
When Danny-boy asked her no less than four times if she had written the memos, she said no and Danny Boy was clearly surprised. This could imply that she was the source. Once the fakes were discovered, she denied it to protect herself, though she threw a few bones to back up Danny Boy, but he cannot out her now (because he made the mistake of interviewing her and outing her now would prove collusion in the forgery between him and her). Just a thought.
Here is the site they are talking about
http://democrats.com/view.cfm?id=23055
Hannity mentioned it last night to the Boston Globe guy.
Neat..I was writing my response at the same time you posted your note. We're on the same page--Knox is my prime suspect, little old lady or no.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.