Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/11/2004 12:49:32 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife

The Hon. Bozonelis. :^)


2 posted on 09/11/2004 12:51:49 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

BTTT


3 posted on 09/11/2004 12:52:28 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Thank GOD President Bush is NOT A LAWYER!


4 posted on 09/11/2004 12:53:14 PM PDT by Republic (Terri Schiavo,saved by TERRI's LAW after 7 days of starvation, fights ACLU-Felos to keep law intact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Haven't many of our presidents been lawyers? Certainly Lincoln and John Adams were.


5 posted on 09/11/2004 12:54:53 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Our Congressmen are more concerned with getting a second term, congressional salaries, pensions, and health plans, than with being moral leaders.

It would also seem so with much of our clergy.

6 posted on 09/11/2004 12:59:52 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Does this mean Clinton could declare his former 8 yrs illegal and now run again since he was dis-barred?
7 posted on 09/11/2004 1:24:13 PM PDT by IceAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

For the life of me, ins't it state imposed proselytism of a certain religion or ideology if NOW and women get 90% of the time the custodies? Isn't sound governance about the admission that sin exists equaly between men and women?

The "hammer and sicle" utilitarian men's money is what children need, but not their mother's immorality and lack of situational awareness, is basicaly a virtual right to abort the child after it is born, at the hands of women, unchecked. Lawyers in the meantime are paid high fees by women for this "freedom", through their men.

One can go back to Roe to figure where it all started.


9 posted on 09/11/2004 1:36:56 PM PDT by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

"The plaintiffs allege that Democratic Presidential nominees, as professional lawyers and officers of the court, thus representing the Judiciary branch, would infringe upon the fundamental doctrines of separation of powers and checks and balances, the very foundation of our republican form of government."

Yes, yes and YES! Many of our founders, Ben Franklin particularly, warned about lawyers making or executing law. This is exactly what the biggest problem was with the Clinton regime. Did you know that The State of Franklin very nearly became the 14th state? In their constitution they required NO lawyers to serve in their legislature. Some of the founders were lawyers, but they mostly agreed it was a grave danger to the country. If you notice, all our agencies are run over with the barristers, like Jamie Gorelick and her "wall". This country must realize that our laws are now of, by and for attorneys. Any time any one group or profession infiltrates and runs our government we are in danger.


10 posted on 09/11/2004 1:52:33 PM PDT by JustAnotherSavage (If you don't like my peaches, don't shake my tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Reducto ad absurdum: The Attorney-General, an Executive office in both state and the federal governments, could not be held by an attorney.

As appealing as this theory is, pigs still don't have wings, but bumblebees do fly.

11 posted on 09/11/2004 2:15:25 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Jeff Head; redrock; Brad's Gramma; patriciaruth; Aquamarine; sauropod; ...

Thanks for posting this Cincinatus' Wife. It's about time!!!

If you read nothing else today, please pay attention to this one. I'm offline most of the time, decided to take a break during this nasty election because some freepers are even too grumpy to be around, but am glad I saw this! Pres. Bush understands the danger of this attorney imbalance of power in our government.

NEVER VOTE FOR A LAWYER!

Have fun all you freeper types, see you after the election.


14 posted on 09/11/2004 3:03:47 PM PDT by AuntB ("Go count your blessings and when you're done come complain to me." MY Grandma!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read later


15 posted on 09/11/2004 3:07:15 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

"We can't wait to start making laws." Staffer of President-elect Bill Clinton, 1992.


17 posted on 09/11/2004 3:25:35 PM PDT by groanup (Our kids sleep soundly because soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines stand ready to die for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

There was, allegedly (Lawyer -Speak), an original 13th (no superscript) Amendment, which banned lawyers from serving in the legislative or executive branches of Govt, and banned holders of titles of nobility,(Barrister is an English Title of Nobility) from same.

The issue in debate is not whether it existed, but whether it was ever ratified. It disappeared around the time of the Civil War from Textbooks on the Constitution.

http://users.frii.com/gosplow/13th.html

"TITLES OF NOBILITY" AND "HONOR"
In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library's oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment's language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this "missing" 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government..."


One of the Authors lived here in Albuquerque and I heard a presentation that was quite interesting.


18 posted on 09/11/2004 3:38:24 PM PDT by moonhawk (NYT headline, 11/03/04: KERRY WINS SILVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; tpaine; Hank Kerchief; All
Excellent article!!

The Founding Fathers intent was for The People to be the final say on persons' actions. For certain, they never intended for the Supreme Court to have the power to mandate whether a law was just. Their intent was that the Supreme Court was a legal opinion. They were leery of the judicial branch  usurping The People's  power.

When the Supreme Court has the power to mandate laws one way or the other the judicial branch holds power over The People -- government subjects.

Yet, in the final analysis...

"The oppressor has nothing more than the power you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assault you if he had not the cooperation from you." -- Voluntary Servitude by Entienne de la Boetie:

Bottom line, probability that politicians and bureaucrats will chose to relinquish their fraudulent concepts, strategies and tactics is several magnitudes more improbable than Dan Rather coming total clean on Memogate.

The real power of the Internet lies in the nature of consciousness.

* * *

More powerful than the main steam media.

More powerful than any government.

More powerful than the court of public opinion.

There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come. -- Victor Hugo (1802-1885)  

The court of public honesty.

If when someone using circa 1972 technology can produce a document that matches the document in question and having the process of creating that document take an acceptable time span and cost that would be roughly equivalent to that warranted at the time the original document was created, then and only then will the court of public honesty accept that the document(s) in question that were aired on 60 Minutes II, hosted by Dan Rather at CBS as being authentic.

Otherwise, as it now stands and until such time as prescribed above the court of public honesty rules that the document(s) in question are forged documents. And, that Dan Rather and CBS are held accountable for foisting deception and fraud on the millions of viewers that watched 60 Minutes II on September 8, 2004..

The pendulum has swung the other direction, toward honest. Honesty outlives the lies, deceptions and irrationalities. It always has and always will. The main stream media, Democrat, the left and liberal politicians are but the first in its path on its way to bowl over Republicans, the right and conservative politicians. Then all politics and religions will succumb to honesty -- conscious nature.

21 posted on 09/11/2004 5:18:04 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson