Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Photos of 1,000 Dead U.S. Soldiers Laid out in NYC (Liberals piss on the Victims of 9/11 once again)
Reuters ^ | 9/11/2004 | Unstated

Posted on 09/11/2004 8:36:44 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins

Photos of 1,000 Dead U.S. Soldiers Laid Out in NYC

Fri Sep 10, 4:00 PM ET

Add U.S. National - Reuters to My Yahoo!

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Photos of more than 1,000 U.S. soldiers who died in Afghanistan (news - web sites) and Iraq (news - web sites) were laid out in Union Square Park in New York on Friday in a display intended to put faces of the fallen before the public.

AP Photo

 

Coming just days after the 1,000th U.S. soldier died in the war in Iraq, the display was organized by Army veteran Nicholas Cohen, who said merely listing deaths in the newspapers each day did not capture the human cost of the war.

"There's no political organization behind this," said Cohen. "This is about the soldiers."

Dozens of passerby stared quietly as volunteers laid out photos in Union Square, which three years earlier had been the site of makeshift memorials for victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

Cohen's mother, Arlene Harrison, said the display was not meant as an anti-war statement.

"We're anti using military force in a knee-jerk way," she said. "We have to have a good, honest, compelling reason before we sacrifice our children."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: New Jersey; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Tactics of the left are indeed despicable, laying out the soldiers of the US war dead today the third anniversary of the September 11th attacks, in order to try to eclipse the memory of the victims of 9/11. They just had to do it the same day, 9/11 the anniversary of the death of the victims, not the war dead.

Does anyone against the war on terror have the guts to watch the video of today's televised anniversary all the way through and look at the pictures of the victims and the relatives?

Instead they crack jokes about people who didn't know the victims as if they aren't entitled to feel bad about what happened.

1 posted on 09/11/2004 8:36:46 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

One day difference I guess here. Same idea though.


2 posted on 09/11/2004 8:38:41 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

When will the American public finally realize what the far-left Democrats really stand for?? They will do anything, say anything, at any price to anyone, for the sake of their own power and control.

Here is a shining example of their constant attempts to deny reality, rewrite history, again, for their own selfish purposes...on the backs of our dead.


3 posted on 09/11/2004 8:41:07 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
I am all for honoring the soldiers who died in the WOT. But today should be about the people who died on Sept. 11th, 2001.

Saying this isn't political is a crock. They made it so. It should be about the people who died on 9-11-01.

4 posted on 09/11/2004 8:42:56 AM PDT by rintense (Results matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

"We have to have a good, honest, compelling reason before we sacrifice our children."

Toronto Globe and Mail

Saddam's chambers of horrors
By MARGARET WENTE
Saturday, November 23, 2002


Abu Ghraib, 30 kilometres west of Baghdad, is Iraq's biggest prison. Until recently, it held perhaps 50,000 people, perhaps more. No one knows for sure. No one knows how many people were taken there through the years and never came out.
For a generation, Abu Ghraib was the centrepiece of Saddam Hussein's reign of torture and death. Yahya al-Jaiyashy is one of the survivors.

Mr. Jaiyashy is an animated, bearded man of 49 whose words can scarcely keep up with the torrent of his memories. Today he lives in Toronto with his second wife, Sahar. This week, he sat down with me to relate his story. With him were his wife, a lovely Iraqi woman in her mid-30s, and a friend, Haithem al-Hassan, who helped me with Mr. Jaiyashy's mixture of Arabic and rapid English.
"Nineteen seventy-seven was the first time I went to jail," he says. "I was not tortured that much."
He was in his mid-20s then, from an intellectual family that lived in a town south of Baghdad. He had been a student of Islamic history, language and religion in the holy city of Najaf, but was forced to quit his studies after he refused to join the ruling Ba'ath party. His ambition was to write books that would show how Islam could open itself up to modernism.

In Saddam's Iraq, this was a dangerous occupation, especially for a Shiite. Shia Muslims are the majority in Iraq, but Saddam and his inner circle are Sunni. Many Shiites were under suspicion as enemies of the state.
"My father was scared for me," says Mr. Jaiyashy. " 'You know how dangerous this regime is,' he told me. 'You know how many people they kill.' "

Mr. Jaiyashy continued his studies on his own. But, eventually, he was picked up, along with a dozen acquaintances who had been involved in political activity against the regime. They were sent to Abu Ghraib. The others did not get off as lightly as he did. One was killed by immersion into a vat of acid. Ten others, he recalls, were put into a room and torn apart by wild dogs. Several prominent religious leaders were also executed. One was a university dean, someone Mr. Jaiyashy remembers as "a great man." They drove a nail through his skull.

For three decades, the most vicious war Saddam has waged has been the one against his own people. Iraq's most devastating weapon of mass destruction is Saddam himself. And the most powerful case for regime change is their suffering.
Sometimes, it is almost impossible to believe the accounts of people who survived Saddam's chamber of horrors. They seem like twisted nightmares, or perhaps crude propaganda. But there are too many survivors who have escaped Iraq, too many credible witnesses. And Mr. Jaiyashy's story, horrible as it is, is not unusual.

Saddam personally enjoyed inflicting torture in the early years of his career, and he has modelled his police state after that of his hero, Stalin. According to Kenneth Pollack, a leading U.S. expert on Iraq, the regime employs as many as half a million people in its various intelligence, security and police organizations. Hundreds of thousands of others serve as informants. Neighbour is encouraged to inform on neighbour, children on their parents. Saddam has made Iraq into a self-policing totalitarian state, where everyone is afraid of everybody else.
"Being in Iraq is like creeping around inside someone else's migraine," says veteran BBC correspondent John Sweeney. "The fear is so omnipresent, you could almost eat it."
To Stalin's methods of arbitrary arrests and forced confessions, Saddam has added an element of sadism: the torture of children to extract information from their parents.

In northern Iraq -- the only place in the country where people can speak relatively freely -- Mr. Sweeney interviewed several people who had direct experience of child torture. He also met one of the victims -- a four-year-old girl, the daughter of a man who had worked for Saddam's psychopathic son Uday. When the man fell under suspicion, he fled to the Kurdish safe haven in the north. The police came for his wife and tortured her to reveal his whereabouts; when she didn't break, they took his daughter and crushed her feet. She was 2 then. Today, she wears metal braces on her legs, and can only hobble.

"This is a regime that will gouge out the eyes of children to force confessions from their parents and grandparents," writes Mr. Pollack in his new book, The Threatening Storm. "This is a regime that will hold a nursing baby at arm's length from its mother and allow the child to starve to death to force the mother to confess. This is a regime that will burn a person's limbs off to force him to confess or comply. This is a regime that will slowly lower its victims into huge vats of acid. . . .
"This is a regime that practises systematic rape against the female victims. This is a regime that will drag in a man's wife, daughter or other female relative and repeatedly rape her in front of him." And if he has fled the country, it will send him the video.

After nearly two years in prison, Mr. Jaiyashy was released and sent to do military service in the north. Then the security police decided to round up the followers of one of the executed clerics. In 1980, Mr. Jaiyashy was arrested again, along with 20 friends, and taken to a military prison. He was interrogated about criticisms he was supposed to have made of the regime, and urged to sign a confession. During one session, his wrists were tied to a ceiling fan. Then they turned on the fan. Then they added weights onto his body and did it again. Then somebody climbed on him to add more weight. "It was 20 minutes, but it seemed like 20 years," he recalls.
He was beaten with a water hose filled with stones. When he passed out, he was shocked back into consciousness with an electric cable. They hung him by his legs, pulled out a fingernail with pliers, and drove an electric drill through his foot.

Mr. Jaiyashy took off his right shoe and sock to show me his foot. It is grotesquely mutilated, with a huge swelling over the arch. There is an Amnesty International report on human-rights abuses in Iraq with a photo of a mutilated foot that looks identical to his. The baby finger on his left hand is also mutilated.
He didn't sign the confession. He knew that, if he did, they would eventually kill him.
They put him in solitary confinement, in a cell measuring two metres by two and a half, without windows or light. Every few weeks, they would bring him the confession again, but he refused to sign. He stayed there for a year.

In 1981, he was sent to trial, where he persuaded a sympathetic judge not to impose the death sentence. He got 10 years instead, and was sent back to Abu Ghraib. "They put me in a cell with 50 people. It was three and a half by three and a half metres. Some stood, some sat. They took turns."
There was a small window in the cell, with a view of a tree. It was the only living thing the prisoners could see. The tree was cut down. There were informants in the cells and, every morning, guards would come and take someone and beat him till he died. "This is your breakfast!" they would say.
Mr. Jaiyashy spent the next six years in that cell. His parents were told he was dead.

Abu Ghraib contained many intellectuals and professional people. Among them was the scientist Hussein Shahristani, a University of Toronto alumnus who became a leading nuclear scientist in Iraq. He was imprisoned after he refused to work on Saddam's nuclear program. He spent 10 years in Abu Ghraib, most of them in solitary confinement, until he escaped in 1991.

Saddam has reduced his people to abject poverty. He wiped out families, villages, cities and cultures, and drove four million people into exile. He killed between 100,000 and 200,000 Kurds. He killed as many as 300,000 Shiites in the uprising after the Persian Gulf war. He killed or displaced 200,000 of the 250,000 marsh Arabs who had created a unique, centuries-old culture in the south. He drained the marshes, an environmental treasure, and turned them into a desert.

In a recent Frontline documentary, a woman who fled Iraq recounted how she and others had been forced to witness the public beheadings of 15 women who had been rounded up for prostitution and other crimes against the state. One of the women was a doctor who had been misreported as speaking against the regime. "They put her head in a trash can," she said.

In 1987, Mr. Jaiyashy and a thousand other inmates were transferred to an outdoor prison camp. There, they were allowed a visit with their relatives, so long as they said nothing of their lives in prison. Mr. Jaiyashy's parents came, hoping he might still be alive. He remembers the day all the families came. "There was so much crying. We called it the crying day."

In 1989, he was finally released from prison. Then came the gulf war and, after that, the uprising, which he joined. It was quickly crushed. He fled with 150,000 refugees toward the Saudi border. But the Saudis didn't want them. "They are Wahhabis," he says. "They consider the Shia as infidels." The United Nations set up a refugee camp, where Mr. Jaiyashy spent the next six years. He began to paint and write again.
Finally, he was accepted as an immigrant to Canada. He arrived in Toronto in 1996, and is now a Canadian citizen.

Mr. Jaiyashy has a deep sense of gratitude toward his adoptive country. Canada, he says, has given him back his freedom and his dignity. He paints prolifically, and has taken courses at the art college, and is the author of three plays about the Saddam regime. He makes his living stocking shelves in a fabric store. "I'm a porter," he says. "No problem. I'm happy."

But Saddam's spies are everywhere. After one of his plays was produced here, his father was imprisoned. His first wife and three children are still in Iraq. He hasn't seen them since his youngest, now 12, was a baby. He talks with them on the phone from time to time, but it is very dangerous. One of his brothers is in Jordan, another still in Iraq.
Sahar, his second wife, is soft-spoken. She covers her head and dresses modestly, without makeup. Her face is unlined. She arrived in Canada with her two daughters the same year as Mr. Jaiyashy; they were introduced by friends.

She, too, has a story. I learned only the smallest part of it. "I was a widow," she told me. "My husband was a doctor in Iraq. He wanted to continue his education and have a specialty. But they didn't allow him. He deserted the military service to continue his education on his own. They beat him till he died."
Today, her daughters are in high school and she teaches at a daycare centre. Her new husband pushed her to study hard here. "ESL, ESL," she says affectionately.
Like many Iraqis, they are conflicted about the prospect of war. They want Saddam gone. But they do not want more harm inflicted on their country. "I want Saddam gone -- only him," says Mr. Jaiyashy.

A few weeks ago, Saddam threw open the doors of Abu Ghraib and freed the prisoners there. Many families rejoiced, and many others, who did not find their loved ones, mounted a brief, unheard-of protest against the regime. The prison is a ghost camp now. Nothing is left but piles of human excrement that cake the razor wire.

Saddam's Iraq is a rebuke to anyone who may doubt that absolute evil dwells among us. No one has put it better than Mr. Sweeney, the BBC reporter. "When I hear the word Iraq, I hear a tortured child screaming."


5 posted on 09/11/2004 8:43:50 AM PDT by Valin (I'll try being nicer if you'll try being smarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Where are the photos of the 9/11 victims?

These goons forget the soldiers died while helping prevent more civillian deaths here.

But the most profane part is that they will lay out the photos in protest, not to honor the fallen, but to disparage their memory and their cause.

What wretched pukes.

6 posted on 09/11/2004 8:46:17 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Rant quietly this day, in remembrance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
"We're anti using military force in a knee-jerk way," she said. "We have to have a good, honest, compelling reason before we sacrifice our children."

If brains were dynamite this lady couldn't blow her nose.

7 posted on 09/11/2004 8:47:16 AM PDT by TigersEye (Are your parents Pro-Choice? I guess you got lucky!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Yes, these protestors are idiots. But in a truly ironic way, they have done us all a service. The soldiers who have fallen in Iraq are clearly casualties of the same evil that brought down the towers. It is not inappropriate to remember them at the same time.

They meant it for evil. God uses it for good.


8 posted on 09/11/2004 8:47:39 AM PDT by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I wish you could send that to Nicholas Cohen and all his supporters.


9 posted on 09/11/2004 8:52:38 AM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Cohen's mother, Arlene Harrison, said the display was not meant as an anti-war statement.

No, it was meant as an anti-American, fork 9-11 statement.

"We're anti using military force in a knee-jerk way," she said. "We have to have a good, honest, compelling reason before we sacrifice our children."

So 9-11 wasn't a good enough reason? 3,000 innocent people sacrificed by complete bastards?

Go to hell, Ms. Cohen.

10 posted on 09/11/2004 8:54:12 AM PDT by Houmatt (I love my wife. You got a problem with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Photos of more than 1,000 U.S. soldiers who died in Afghanistan (news - web sites) and Iraq ..."

Now I get it! They're talking about the War on Terror! I kept hearing "1000 dead" and thinking "Iraq" and recalling the number around 700 last time I'd heard, wondering:" What happened to the other 300?"

Now I understand: they've linked the Afghani War and the Iraq war! This gives them their even thou. Of course it also joins the two, which up 'til now, they insisted were unrelated: one was about Osama and omar, the other about oil. So much for that line of BS!

So, next time your liberal friends mention "1000 casualties," tell them they're low by a factor of four.

11 posted on 09/11/2004 8:57:35 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Sorry, I was so enraged by this I messed up the stupid woman's name.

I meant to say "Go to hell, Ms. Harrison."

12 posted on 09/11/2004 8:57:54 AM PDT by Houmatt (I love my wife. You got a problem with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

It was in the run up to OIF, Dennis Prager read some letters from 1st-2nd graders at a Quaker school to President Bush. "Please don't go to war", "Killing is bad", "God doesn't like war"...that sort of thing.
All of a sudden the light bulb went on and I realized that this was just the sort of thing coming from much of the "peace" movement. I then realized that for some reason their moral development stopped at about age 7.


13 posted on 09/11/2004 9:02:13 AM PDT by Valin (I'll try being nicer if you'll try being smarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

I may never be able to go to a freep again. They are doing an excellent job pulling me down to their level.

They have gone so far overboard, I would have to hurt them if they were in my direct presence.


14 posted on 09/11/2004 9:02:53 AM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

Interestiing that we don't see the number of terrorist killed in this time period.

Context is everything

The Ten Costliest Battles of the Civil War
Based on total casualties (killed, wounded, missing, and captured)
http://www.civilwarhome.com/Battles.htm

#1
Battle of Gettysburg
Date: July 1-3, 1863

Location: Pennsylvania
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: George G. Meade
Confederate Forces Engaged: 75,000
Union Forces Engaged: 82,289
Winner: Union
Casualties: 51,112 (23,049 Union and 28,063 Confederate)





#2
Battle of Chickamauga
Date: September 19-20, 1863

Location: Georgia
Confederate Commander: Braxton Bragg
Union Commander: William Rosecrans
Confederate Forces Engaged: 66,326
Union Forces Engaged: 58,222
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 34,624 (16,170 Union and 18,454 Confederate)





#3
Battle of Chancellorsville
Date: May 1-4, 1863

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Joseph Hooker
Confederate Forces Engaged: 60,892
Union Forces Engaged: 133,868
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 30,099 (17,278 Union and 12,821 Confederate)





#4
Battle of Spotsylvania
Date: May 8-19, 1864

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 50,000
Union Forces Engaged: 83,000
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 27,399 (18,399 Union and 9)000 Confederate)





#5
Battle of Antietam
Date: September 17, 1862

Location: Maryland
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: George B. McClellan
Confederate Forces Engaged: 51,844
Union Forces Engaged: 75,316
Winner: Union
Casualties: 26,134 (12,410 Union and 13,724 Confederate)





#6
Battle of The Wilderness
Date: May 5-7, 1864

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 61,025
Union Forces Engaged: 101,895
Winner: Inconclusive
Casualties: 25,416 (17,666 Union and 7,750 Confederate)





#7
Battle of Second Manassas
Date: August 29-30, 1862

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: John Pope
Confederate Forces Engaged: 48,527
Union Forces Engaged: 75,696
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 25,251 (16,054 Union and 9,197 Confederate)





#8
Battle of Stone's River
Date: December 31, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: Braxton Bragg
Union Commander: William S. Rosecrans
Confederate Forces Engaged: 37,739
Union Forces Engaged: 41,400
Winner: Union
Casualties: 24,645 (12,906 Union and 11,739 Confederate)





#9
Battle of Shiloh
Date: April 6-7, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: Albert Sidney Johnston/ P. G. T. Beauregard
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 40,335
Union Forces Engaged: 62,682
Winner: Union
Casualties: 23,741 (13,047 Union and 10,694 Confederate)





#10
Battle of Fort Donelson
Date: February 13-16, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: John B. Floyd/Simon B. Buckner
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 21,000
Union Forces Engaged: 27,000
Winner: Union
Casualties: 19,455 (2,832 Union and 16,623 Confederate)






I also recall reading that on 6 June 1944 America was losing soldiers at the rate of 1,000 an HOUR.

Context Context Context


15 posted on 09/11/2004 9:11:16 AM PDT by Valin (I'll try being nicer if you'll try being smarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newheart
The soldiers who have fallen in Iraq are clearly casualties of the same evil that brought down the towers. It is not inappropriate to remember them at the same time.

My thoughts exactly. All we need do is put the proper face on these actions. Don't let the perpetrators of evil use these fallen heroes for their own purposes. Tell the world we honor them as voluntary victims of the terrorists. Tell the world how blessed we are to share brotherhood with such valiant men.

16 posted on 09/11/2004 9:47:04 AM PDT by MSSC6644
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

They"support our troops" out of one side of their mouths, and then show their hatered toward them out of the other. Nothing thrills a scurvy lefty like a picture of a dead American GI...


17 posted on 09/11/2004 9:57:28 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against Jean-France Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

My son, SGT Brian Wood, is one of the 1000, and presumably his photo has been placed with the rest. Brian believed in what he was doing in Iraq, and told me he was proud of being able to help the Iraqi people.

I am offended beyond my ability to express that these people would use my son and his sacrifice to promote their own ideas. They do not have my permission to use his likeness or name in this manner, and the continued use of these heroes names and photos for purposes which they would NEVER agree to is disgusting.


18 posted on 09/11/2004 10:07:06 AM PDT by BriansDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BriansDad

Your son was a true hero, as are all the soldiers in Iraq.

When we honor the fallen, we should not treat them as 'victims' for they are not - they are heros, who took risks and gave lives, so we could have more security and have our lives saved. There is nothing more honorable than that noble sacrifice for others. we should remember what they are fighting for - for us, our freedom, and to defeat the force of extremism and terrorism in that part of the world.

War is hell, and war is ugly, but it is not without purpose nor rightness at times. And this effort in Iraq is one of the most justified and right war efforts in our history.

I try to do some explaining of that on my Liberating Iraq blog:
http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com

Can I post your comments there?


19 posted on 09/11/2004 10:33:45 AM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BriansDad

Please accept my deepest condolences on the loss of your son.


20 posted on 09/11/2004 10:39:38 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against Jean-France Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson