Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times Fingers Judeo-Christians in Beslan Deaths
Dawn Patrol ^ | 07 September 2004 | Dawn Eden

Posted on 09/08/2004 3:14:00 PM PDT by Lorianne

I know that's a strong headline, but imagine you're a person who only gets his or her news from the New York Times. For many people, that isn't much of a stretch.

You open up today's Times to the Page 3 feature on the Beslan horror. It doesn't mention that the terrorists were Muslims.

I know, I know. The sun rose today in the east, the sky is blue, roses are red, and the Times won't call terrorists Muslims. What else is new?

How about altering a quote specifically to remove any implication that the Beslan terrorists were Muslims?

The wire services reported, in a quote printed in thousands of newspapers, that the captured Beslan terrorist said, "By Allah, I did not shoot."

Today's Times piece quotes him as saying, "By God, I did not shoot"—a translation that no other news organization has used.

In other words, the Times wanted so badly to leave Islam out of its Beslan feature that it altered the terrorist's quote.

This is more than political correctness. This is the deliberate alteration of a news quote to create the false impression that a terrorist follows the Judeo-Christian God and not Allah.

This is an outrage.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: mediabias

1 posted on 09/08/2004 3:14:01 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I would like to say that I am shocked and will cancel my subscription to the New York Times, but I can no longer be surprised by them and I cancelled my subscription long ago.


2 posted on 09/08/2004 3:18:06 PM PDT by bondjamesbond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I just read an article from the NYT in our local Tulsa World about the CULT OF DEATH. This Cult of death is mentioned quite a few times and the article is very detrimental to the way the world sees that Cult of death.

The words MUSLIM and ISLAM are never mentioned.


3 posted on 09/08/2004 3:22:37 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (DEMS STILL LIE like yellow dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It is an outrage, but typical of leftists to twist reality to suit their own political view.

The only way to fight back is to stop consuming their product. Just stop buying their paper and any other paper that uses NYT stories.

I cancelled my paper for this reason and I made sure that I let them know why. Why give money to people who hate you and blame you for all the ills in the world. Put them out of business!


4 posted on 09/08/2004 3:24:03 PM PDT by Owl558 (Pardon my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

In no way is Allah the God of the Bible.


5 posted on 09/08/2004 3:24:11 PM PDT by tkathy (There will be no world peace until all thuggocracies are gone from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Well, obviously, by their own lights, the NYT found it unfit to print.


6 posted on 09/08/2004 3:29:44 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I don't give a rats behind if their Judeo, Christian or Islamic. Frankly, the neither. They are EVIL. Period. They can evoke Allah all they want, but I think I can say with all candor that God isn't pleased and, as He is so fond of saying:

Vengeance is mine, I WILL repay, sayeth the Lord."
7 posted on 09/08/2004 3:31:45 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond
This is a result of modern journalism schools. They are committed to using their intelligence to control the news their way. They are too intelligent to try to be "objective" or even be honest reporters. They are so musch wiser than us that they deem it their duty to apply their "journalistic standards" to prevent us from having an emotional reaction to an group that they want to protect from untoward emotional reactions.

Even this must be qualified. They would allow us to have an emotional reaction for a black or Muslim or homosexual or feminist or marxist victim, but not against any of the above or for the contrary of any of the above. Otherwise, their standards will be hard at work--as if we were all grammar school students, protecting us from ourselves. This is the most obtuse of the "elite media's" many conceits.

8 posted on 09/08/2004 3:32:53 PM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Its no different than when the press goes out of their way to point out that a criminal is, for example, an illegal alien.


9 posted on 09/08/2004 3:36:34 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Of course I meant to say; Its no different than when the press goes out of their way to avoid pointing out that a criminal is an illegal alien.


10 posted on 09/08/2004 3:37:38 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I think Muslims are Judeo-Christians, aren't they?

At least by some definitions.
11 posted on 09/08/2004 3:38:41 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

In this Land which is allegedly Your Land and My Land, where the media proclaims itself “free” and “independent,” virtually all news networks just happen to be conducting a simultaneous blackout on TRUTH. I have not seen people from the cornucopias of Christian or Jewish religions running around blowing up themselves and the people around them...these same people normally don’t wear veils or other masks (SWAT teams are excluded) and long robes covering tennis shoes and jeans along with whatever ammunition de jour. By all accounts terrorists are Militant Islamists – Muslims; whether the New York Times wants to go along with “Suicide Bomber” rather than murderer, or “freedom fighters” rather than terrorists simply makes that newspaper not at all relevant to today’s War on Terrorism and the Queen of Political Correctness – a not so cute word for Censorship!


12 posted on 09/08/2004 3:46:01 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Ever read the short story called "Let Them Eat Nutri-Cake" It will put into perspective what the media is doing with the entire war on terror quite nicely.


13 posted on 09/08/2004 4:08:53 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aetius

Saying an illegal alien is a criminal is redundant. He is a criminal simply on the basis that he is in the country illegally.


14 posted on 09/09/2004 4:07:49 AM PDT by bondjamesbond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson