Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moore going for BEST PICTURE Oscar
Fox News ^ | September 7, 2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 09/07/2004 12:08:30 AM PDT by Ronzo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Casloy
I hope it wins. Saving Private Ryan losing to Shakespeare in Love was when I stopped watching that stupid parade of leftwingers.

Same here. I don't think there's been any Oscar winning movie I've hated more than "Shakespear in Love," with the possible exception of "The English Patient."

Though one thing I did like about "English Patient" was a small cameo appearance by my favorite German actor: Jurgen Prochnow (Das Boot anyone???)

21 posted on 09/07/2004 12:42:09 AM PDT by Ronzo (GOD alone is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

DAS BOOT and GODFATHER I and II. The only movies I watch over and over.


22 posted on 09/07/2004 12:47:20 AM PDT by Casloy (qs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny; Ronzo; DoughtyOne; Keith in Iowa; Prime Choice; Mudboy Slim; Tax-chick; PhilDragoo; ...
MICHAEL MOORE IS A BIG FAT STUPID WHITE MAN

-by David T. Hardy and Jason Clarke

23 posted on 09/07/2004 12:54:14 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (This tag-line paid for by "Friends of Paul Rodriguez.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

I doubt the suits of the accademy will allow advertisers to flee a program praising moore.

Think about the mere fallout from such a move. ALL other nominees would instantly "disappear" and it would become the michael moore show. (which is what moore is intentially doing)


24 posted on 09/07/2004 1:01:04 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

since it was a "bootleg" copy that aired, the accademy has already said it does not disqualify moore.


25 posted on 09/07/2004 1:05:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

This is funny. Moore thinks he's leading a Hollywood pack but the big Oscars are big money acquisitions. No one is going to let a fat little "documentary" filmmaker into their big money game.


26 posted on 09/07/2004 1:27:49 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo
Well, it is a work of total fiction, so why not submit it for best (sic) picture. This is a strange world where such an untalented man could even be considered for an Oscar. I suppose that this is his demand for payback from the neo-commies who support Kerry. I'd like to find out which democrat "527" helped provide funding for this crap in a film can.
27 posted on 09/07/2004 1:37:05 AM PDT by Che Chihuahua (The only good liberal is a dead communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo
I retched and puked when I read recently that Mort Sahl named Fidel "the butcher" Castro as the man he admired most. Why do people like Moore and Sahl get away with such blatant anti-American sentiments?
28 posted on 09/07/2004 1:40:50 AM PDT by Che Chihuahua (The only good liberal is a dead communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

Michael Moore says he won't submit "Fahrenheit 9/11" for consideration as best documentary. Why? Is Garfield up for best documentary also?


29 posted on 09/07/2004 2:01:29 AM PDT by elder5 (freedom is not America's gift to the world, it is the Almighty God's gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

If he's going after the Best Film Oscar, then he's admitting that it isn't truthful.


30 posted on 09/07/2004 2:55:08 AM PDT by mass55th ( “Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

This also gives the acadamy the weak excuse it needs to NOT pick "The Passion" (assuming it's been entered).


31 posted on 09/07/2004 5:23:39 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elder5
Why?

If he removes it from the documentary category the rules say he can air the movie on TV 9 months after it was released to theaters and still be eligible for an Academy Award in another category. Moore's movie cannot be aired on TV before the election and still be eligible for an Academy Award as a documentary. The fat bastard is willing to give up a guaranteed Oscar in the documentary to have it aired before the election.

The airing on Cuba TV does not count because Moore wasn't responsible for the airing. LOL!

32 posted on 09/07/2004 5:32:51 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

OTHER BEST PICTURE NOMINEES THROUGH HISTORY

"The Broadway Melody of 1936"
"Wilson"
"The Greatest Show on Earth"
"Cleopatra"
"Hello, Dolly!"
"Airport"
"Love Story"
"Cabaret"
"The Towering Inferno"
"Norma Rae"
"Reds"
"Born on the Fourth of July"
"Ghost"
"JFK"
"The Full Monty"
"American Beauty"

33 posted on 09/07/2004 5:38:00 AM PDT by Flux Capacitor (ZELL MILLER IN '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee; Prime Choice
This just in from the IMDB web site (www.imdb.com):

Michael Moore has disclosed that he will not submit his Fahrenheit 9/11 for consideration in the Best Documentary category and will instead aim for the Best Picture Oscar. The film was the surprise winner of the Cannes Film Festival's top prize this year. His decision also frees him to release Fahrenheit on TV before the Nov. 2 elections. Under Academy restrictions, films submitted for the documentary Oscar may not play on television until nine months after they are released theatrically. Moore said on his website that he is hoping to persuade Columbia TriStar Home Video, which is releasing the Fahrenheit DVD on Oct. 5, to allow him to screen the film on TV on or before election eve, Nov. 1, adding, however: "I have no assurance from our home video distributor that they would allow a one-time television broadcast -- and the chances are they probably won't."

34 posted on 09/07/2004 6:14:41 PM PDT by Ronzo (GOD alone is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson