Skip to comments.
Tests show Saddam's No. 2 not in custody
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5921663/ ^
| 8:21 a.m. ET Sept. 6, 2004
| The Associated Press
Posted on 09/06/2004 6:26:32 AM PDT by The Raven
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Medical tests have shown that a man being held in Iraqi custody is not former president Saddam Hussein's deputy, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, Interior Ministry spokesman Sabah Kadhim said Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aldouri
Oh Oh....put the King of Clubs back in the deck
1
posted on
09/06/2004 6:26:33 AM PDT
by
The Raven
To: The Raven
The renowned, infamous Red-Headed Stepchild!
2
posted on
09/06/2004 6:31:25 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
To: The Raven
This is the guy they caught just yesterday?
3
posted on
09/06/2004 6:31:57 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: The Raven
Tests show Saddam's No. 2 not in custodyEwww...then what happens when Saddam does a "No. 2"?
4
posted on
09/06/2004 6:33:28 AM PDT
by
krb
To: The Raven
Then who Izzat guy in custody?
5
posted on
09/06/2004 6:35:12 AM PDT
by
Constitution Day
(O Frabjous Day! Callooh! Callay!)
To: The Raven
6
posted on
09/06/2004 6:38:03 AM PDT
by
deport
(In politics, as in fishing, you don't have to be a genius. You just have to be smarter than the fish)
To: dangus
This is the guy they caught just yesterday?
7
posted on
09/06/2004 6:38:37 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: The Raven
We are sure he is Izzat Ibrahim," information official Ibrahim Janabi said. "He was arrested in a clinic in Makhoul near Tikrit and Adwar and 60 percent of the DNA test has finished." Headline says he's not him but DNA shows he probably is. So, is he or isn't he???
8
posted on
09/06/2004 6:38:49 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
To: mtbopfuyn
9
posted on
09/06/2004 6:41:23 AM PDT
by
The Raven
(Has never listened to Air America!!!)
To: The Raven
Aren't they all? Seems everyone and their goats claimed at one point to be Sadam's cousins.
To: deport
11
posted on
09/06/2004 7:01:44 AM PDT
by
traumer
To: mtbopfuyn
Headline says he's not him but DNA shows he probably is. So, is he or isn't he???
That's a john sKerry question???
12
posted on
09/06/2004 7:05:44 AM PDT
by
danamco
To: mtbopfuyn
suspect they have no-one at all. It seems pretty clear there was no operation near Tikrit and the reports that 150 were killed are false.
To: The Raven
Note that the Associated Press is the source. Should we necessarily believe it?
To: The Raven
Oh Oh....put the King of Clubs back in the deck Are you kidding? I already had 2 dates for his capture before yesterday. I'm going to run out of room on his card to put down a final date of capture.
15
posted on
09/06/2004 11:50:48 AM PDT
by
The Bat Lady
(Lighting the fires of Liberty, one heart at a time!)
To: The Raven
Kerry has clarified it :
"We had him in custody before we didn't have him in custody....." He then went on to state that No one has ever escaped from stallack 13.
16
posted on
09/06/2004 8:10:45 PM PDT
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
