1 posted on
09/02/2004 3:07:51 PM PDT by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
< "I think the voters have decided they do not want to reelect the president," Devine said. "And I think that's manifest today." >
Ummm...now drink your Kool-Aide like a good boy.
2 posted on
09/02/2004 3:13:14 PM PDT by
GOP_Proud
(Those who preach tolerance seem to have the least for my views.)
To: RWR8189
I think the bottom line is that the Kerry campaign still doesn't understand that their real problem is their candidate and his baggage.
For example, I think the "John Kerry says/John Kerry does" ads probably inflicted far more damage than the Swifties, because it directly attacks his talking points (with his own words). For a lot of people, those ads probably crystallized a nagging but previously undefined dislike for John Kerry.
3 posted on
09/02/2004 3:14:06 PM PDT by
r9etb
To: RWR8189
Kerry's convention was a month earlier than Bush's, thus giving the president a whole extra month to spend money from his campaign stash, and leaving Kerry defenseless when the Swift boat veterans began their ad campaign.
Yeah, that $500,000 SBVT ad buy just rolled over the Dems.
4 posted on
09/02/2004 3:16:23 PM PDT by
Mike Fieschko
(Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
To: RWR8189
5 posted on
09/02/2004 3:18:50 PM PDT by
jimbo123
To: RWR8189
"Whenever you make a decision to engage an issue like this on the candidate level, that's a very difficult process."
Being caught in a lie with your pants down requires some very skillful lying, on the level of Clinton.
To: RWR8189
The Swift Boat Vets and their shoe string budget having had the impact they have points to how vulnerable Kerry really is. This isn't David vs. Goliath (in terms of resources available for the struggle). This is a gnat in a hurricane, and the hurricane is losing!
We haven't yet really made it into a dissection of Kerry's record. Wasn't he elected senator sometime since the Vietnam War?
11 posted on
09/02/2004 3:25:11 PM PDT by
stevem
To: RWR8189
Kerry's political campaign is history and those close to him know it.
To: RWR8189
Maybe that's because she, along with senior strategist Bob Shrum, has taken most of the blame for the Kerry campaign's ham-fisted response to the anti-Kerry veterans. Oh, please. they know 95% of what the Swifties say is true, so they lashed out the only way they could - call them liars and not let any reporter ask Kerry a question.
14 posted on
09/02/2004 3:32:25 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: RWR8189
re: "Sen. Kerry privately is said to be "bouncing off the walls" in frustration"
Ask yourself what would President Bush do it his staff were messing things up so badly. I expect he would step and take over the running of the campaign personally! If Kerry can't even handle the running of his campaign, how the heck is he going to manage an entire nation. His record during this campaign is more than sufficient to show that he simple doesn't have what it takes to be president.
16 posted on
09/02/2004 3:37:11 PM PDT by
jwpjr
To: RWR8189
The Kerry camp said they've miscalculated, however, specifically in the campaign's response to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. "We didn't understand the degree to which [the Swifties] would become the focal point for August," Cahill said.Well, that's because you thought that having the MSM in your pocket was all the ammo you'd ever need. Arrogance always turns on its master; just ask the good and dead, child of second cousins, Schicklegruber: he wanted nothing to do with 'Jewish physics.'
And Devine said the campaign had trouble coming up with a response: "Whenever you make a decision to engage an issue like this on the candidate level, that's a very difficult process."
That's only true when you don't have the truth on your side, or your opponent has you so boxed in that no matter what direction you choose to move in, a bludgeoning awaits. They've flanked you on your right, they've flanked you on your left. There's tons of old voice that can be re-played, there's tons of voting records that can be made known, and only you know what else might comprise a set of crosshairs.
Who hates you, baby?
To: RWR8189
"But things can turn around. On Friday, Kerry unleashes a $45 million barrage of television advertising in key battleground states."
I'm quaking in my boots. Look at how well the first $60 million worked!
BTW, didn't Custer say something like, "things can turn around" right before the last wave of Indians came over the ridge?
22 posted on
09/02/2004 3:57:24 PM PDT by
LS
To: RWR8189
"...Sen. Kerry privately is said to be "bouncing off the walls" in frustration..."
Now that has to be a sight!
23 posted on
09/02/2004 4:02:52 PM PDT by
Maria S
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, 6/28/04)
To: RWR8189
$45 million dollars? Covering what time period? They only have 75 million to spend for the next 2 months, don't they?
25 posted on
09/02/2004 4:09:00 PM PDT by
hobson
To: RWR8189; neverdem; Howlin
"The Kerry campaign wanted to talk to journalists, and quickly, so a last minute breakfast was held Thursday morning in the Times Square Hilton. Usually these breakfasts involve about 30 reporters posing questions to 1 or 2 campaign types. Not this morning. Instead there were six Kerry campaign officials at Thursday's breakfast, all high-level personnel: Mary Beth Cahill, the campaign manager, Tad Devine, senior strategist, new hire Joe Lockhart, pollster Mark Mellman, Doug Sosnick, and Stephanie Cutter, Kerry's communications director.Nope.
Nothing to see here. folks.
No cooperation from a willing national press corpse at all in propping up Kerry's campaign, nor in getting out his message directly from the dnc.
Nothing to see here, folks. Just moveon.org .
26 posted on
09/02/2004 4:11:30 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!))
To: RWR8189
On Tuesday, for example, the campaign announced several new hires, including former Clinton flack Joe Lockhart, who is now a senior adviser to Kerry, and Joel Johnson, another former Clinton hand, who will now handle the campaign's rapid response. Kerry's in the water floundering, calling for the Clintons to throw him a life preserver. I'm thinking what they just threw him is an anchor.
To: RWR8189
Yeah, yeah. It's all Shrum's fault, who, BTW, has advanced Dim causes far, far beyond their appeal to a semi-sane world. No word that the problems are caused by...Mr. Kerry's lies and liberal record.
36 posted on
09/02/2004 5:04:24 PM PDT by
jammer
To: RWR8189
--------------------------------
To print out and wear as a Campaign Button, go HERE. Over 3,600 hits as of 9/2! Feel free to reuse this anywhere you wish...
Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.
38 posted on
09/02/2004 6:19:19 PM PDT by
sonofatpatcher2
(Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson