[kattracks]

The first thing Kerry would have done in Iraq is...nothing.

[epluribus_2]

First thing would be to end sanctions and declare Saddam's Iraq "WMD Free" according to the inspectors... then wait until the next 9/11 here.

[VisualizeSmallerGovernment]

Amazing that he can't tell us ONE THING that he would do differently now.

[goldstategop]

Yep. He's not even that good a liar. Hence the silence in the room.

[Rutles4Ever]

Preposterous! BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Where do we start?

My dream debate panel:

Britt Hume: Senator Kerry, you claimed on September 1st that you would have done "everything differently" in Iraq. How do you expect the American public to contain their laughter?

[TheBigB]

He would have LOST.

[WoodstockCat]

gee Mr. Kerry, you mean that moment of candor like you saying "We will not join the American Legion or VFW"?

[abc1]

It would have been nice if kerry did anything in his Senate career (?).

[Always Right]

Kerry's Iraq War Plan:

1. Vote to go to war.
2. Don't fund the war.

Well, that is a different approach.

[Brilliant]

You mean he would have lost?

[Larry Lucido]

"Kerry Would Have Done 'Almost Everything Differently' in Iraq"

For one thing, he would have invaded via Cambodia.

[Mr. Jeeves]

"90-90 hindsight", as GHWB would have put it. ;)

[shezza]

"I would do as I say, not as I do."

[Always Right]

Kerry bashed Bush's use of the term "catastrophic success," saying the U.S. must bring "our allies to our side," share the burden of the war that is currently costing the U.S. taxpayer, and reduce the risks to U.S. soldiers.

Who????? France, Germany????? LOL, both said they did not care who the President was, they would not support the war.

[brewcrew]

Kerry Would Have Done 'Almost Everything Differently' in Iraq

That's why he sucks.

[Spackidagoosh]

Sounds very similar to what he said about Vietnam.

[DaveMSmith]

Kerry would have started by sending his lawyers and demanding Bush denounce Saddam.

[VisualizeSmallerGovernment]

"If I were in charge of World War II, there would have been no Dunkirk, Battle of the Bulge, or Bataan Death March, but that Japanese Surrender thing would have been pretty cool. Except, of course, I would have done it smarter, better, faster, less expensively and with more sensitivity."

[fortheDeclaration]

"With the right policies, this is a war we can win"

There is the escape hatch from using the military, 'right policies'.
The Democrats believe that ALL diplomacy must be fully exhausted before any military force is used and then only for the purpose of resuming diplomatic efforts.
Hence, the 'right policies' for Kerry is talk, talk and more talk.

[daviddennis]

Kerry added that he would have given weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to search for weapons of mass destruction, not because inspectors would have found all the weapons, "but because by doing do, we could have brought other countries to our side."

... in direct conflict with their own interests.

He'd be waiting a long time.

What makes Kerry particularly scary is that he doesn't seem to understand this. I think he takes our European friends at face value, which is surely a bad thing in this Age of Nuance.

D

[Lazamataz]

Kerry Would Have Done 'Almost Everything Differently' in Iraq

Like committing atrocities, getting medals for them, then hurling those medals on the White House Lawn.