Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gymnastics Officials Ask Hamm To Give Up Gold Medal
AP | 8/27/04 | AP - Eddie Pells

Posted on 08/27/2004 7:19:37 AM PDT by technomage

ATHENS, Greece (AP)
EDDIE PELLS

Gymnastics officials asked American Paul Hamm to give up his gold medal as the ultimate show of sportsmanship, but the United States Olympic Committee told them to take responsibility for their own mistakes.

In a dispute over scores that has turned into a political squabble, the head of the International Gymnastics Federation wrote a letter to Hamm on Thursday night that suggested giving the all-around gold medal to South Korea's Yang Tae-young "would be recognized as the ultimate demonstration of fair play by the whole world."

FIG president Bruno Grandi tried to have the letter sent to Hamm through the USOC, but the USOC refused to deliver it.

In a letter back to Grandi, USOC secretary general Jim Scherr called the request "a blatant and inappropriate attempt on the part of (FIG) to once again shift responsibility for its own mistakes and instead pressure Mr. Hamm into resolving what has become an embarrassing situation for your federation."

Yang, the bronze medalist, was wrongly docked a tenth of a point on his parallel bars routine. If he had received the proper score, he would have won gold and Hamm would have won silver. Three judges were suspended, and FIG said the results would stand.

Through his agent, Hamm declined comment.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Friday, Grandi said he felt the issue was closed until he saw a quote from Hamm, who said earlier this week he would abide by FIG's decision, and give the gold back if the federation said he must.

Although Grandi's letter says "the true winner of the all-around competition is Yang Tae-young" the FIG president insisted he's not pressuring Hamm to give back the gold.

"There is no doubt he has won the medal," Grandi said. "He

deserves the medal and the ranking is clear. . . . "I respect totally Paul Hamm and all the decisions he makes. If he says give back the medal, I respect it. Don't give back the medal, I respect the decision. He is not responsible for anything."

The USOC had a much different interpretation of the letter. "I don't know of any comparison in any sport anywhere where you crown an athlete, crown a team and then say, 'Oh, that was a mistake. Would you fix this for us?"' USOC chairman Peter Ueberroth said.

Uberroth said the USOC considers the case closed, based on the FIG ruling - that the scores could not be changed - and from a statement from International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge, who said the IOC would stick with the results turned in by the federation and wouldn't step in unless there were clear signs of impropriety.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: olympics; usteam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2004 7:19:38 AM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: technomage

USA to World: KISS MY GRITS!


2 posted on 08/27/2004 7:20:54 AM PDT by gunnygail (Pooping that hot spicy Thai food this morning was SEARED, SEARED into my brain, I tell you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Take the Silver. No one wants a tainted medal.


3 posted on 08/27/2004 7:21:00 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

How about: "DNC Officials Ask Kerry to Give Up Medals"


4 posted on 08/27/2004 7:21:45 AM PDT by Boss_Jim_Gettys (Bush/Cheney, the Official Candidates of the 2004 Olympic Summer Games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?


5 posted on 08/27/2004 7:21:46 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

No way in hell should Paul Hamm give up his gold medal.


6 posted on 08/27/2004 7:21:59 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

IOC is a socialist run bunch of American haters.
It's absolutely making them ill that we are running away with the medal count in such a balanced fashion.


7 posted on 08/27/2004 7:22:31 AM PDT by WoodstockCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

That's what Tim Daggett pointed out during the apparatus finals.


8 posted on 08/27/2004 7:23:21 AM PDT by JacksonCalhoun (Bruce - you have always sucked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It's not tainted.

Do baseball scores stand if the ump admits, a day later, that he blew a call?

In the competition, at the time, Hamm won the gold.

Case closed.

9 posted on 08/27/2004 7:23:40 AM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Thanks, but no thanks. The Korean was penalized when he shouldn't have been and wasn't penalized when he should have been. These things happen. When the final tally was made, Hamm was the winner. End of story.


10 posted on 08/27/2004 7:23:54 AM PDT by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

"Yang, the bronze medalist, was wrongly docked a tenth of a point on his parallel bars routine. If he had received the proper score, he would have won gold and Hamm would have won silver."

This lie was refuted the other night during the mens individual competitions. It was noted that while the judges had not rated the routine properly that they could have also deducted TWO tenths for an error that they failed to see.

Had they properly rated it and properly judges it he would have bene in fourth and not received the bronze.

It's time for the FIG to shut the hell up and stop tainting this medal.


11 posted on 08/27/2004 7:24:02 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

12 posted on 08/27/2004 7:24:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

No judgement is perfect on every possible fault...you would need more judges, cameras at every angle...and a super-computer analysis..

Keep the gold....you earned it....

imo


13 posted on 08/27/2004 7:24:33 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

He always be an asterisk.


14 posted on 08/27/2004 7:24:33 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Who would want to take a medal under these circumstances?

Anyone want to bet who Hamm will vote for for president? Liberals seem to fancy men with tainted medals.


15 posted on 08/27/2004 7:24:59 AM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

They showed on NBC that the Korean actually did 4 "holds" during his routine, the max is three, with an auto deduct of 0.1 for more. He was not docked the 0.1 due to another error by the officials. They started him out 0.1 too low and then didn't dock him the mandatory 0.1.

So, the errors cancel each other out. Hamm wins Gold fairly.

I don't know if this is true or not but they showed it and he clearly had four (maybe even five) "holds".


16 posted on 08/27/2004 7:25:06 AM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
I thought Yang was also wrongly NOT docked two tenths for having too many holds?

What you say is true, but if the IOC admits that then they have no ground for the opportunistic USA bashing they just love so much.

17 posted on 08/27/2004 7:25:12 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: technomage

The Koreans protested only after it was clear their guy wasn't going to win, not immediately after the score was posted.


18 posted on 08/27/2004 7:25:21 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Heck, he didn't taint it. Too, it's been shown that had they correctly scored the South Korean, he would have lost anyway.


19 posted on 08/27/2004 7:25:22 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

They already ruled that the gold stays with Hamm, case closed. On a side note, kerry's flip-flopping record supports this nuanced stance from the Olympics.....


20 posted on 08/27/2004 7:26:20 AM PDT by tioga (Flush the johns in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson