Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Proposal Could Throw Election To Kerry
Gary Halbert - Forecasts & Trends Weekly E-Letter ^ | 8-25-2004 | Gar D. Halbert

Posted on 08/25/2004 6:25:07 AM PDT by Cacique

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Interesting piece from a mailing list I belong to. Seemed worthy of posting.

The RATS are trying to circumvent the way the constitution is supposed to work. So what's new?



1 posted on 08/25/2004 6:25:07 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; nutmeg; The Scourge of Yazid; Clemenza; PARodrig; firebrand; NYC GOP Chick; rmlew; ...
Ping your ping lists if you have any.



2 posted on 08/25/2004 6:27:49 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Freeper N. Theknow says:
"It’s faster than a checkbook, more powerful than a Democratic demagogue, able to lay waste to a liar Kerry with the single click of a mouse. It's a little bird of truth, it's plain to see Kerry's unfit... it's... it's...SuperFReep!

Want to join in the fun?
Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!

3 posted on 08/25/2004 6:28:36 AM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
I just got this EXPOSE KERRY'S FRAUD SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH sticker on my truck yesterday afternoon.

Made by fellow FReeper disabled vet who has a bone to pick with Kerry, like we all do!
Large $20 (24" Wide 12" Tall) like mine
Small $10 (12" Wide 6" Tall)
Profits go to SwiftVets.com

FReep mail for details.

4 posted on 08/25/2004 6:28:56 AM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Split your votes, your state becomes all but overlooked in the election campaigning-- why would a candidate divert attention from a state where 51% gives them everything, to go to Colorado to try to get 60%? It's playing 'hard-to-get' when other states are more willing to put out.
5 posted on 08/25/2004 6:32:22 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

How can they place this proposal on the upcoming November 2nd ballot, to have it take effect at the same time?


6 posted on 08/25/2004 6:32:33 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chieftain
Ahh same Jimmy I have. Mine is white and has the US flag and eagle on back.



7 posted on 08/25/2004 6:33:25 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
In fact, while they are pushing hard to get the initiative on the ballot, they are also preparing to challenge it legally – IF it doesn’t work out in their favor (ie- Kerry wins).

So the Democrats are for this iniative but planning to challenge against it? Makes perfect sense to me. I live in Florida and I've seen it before.

8 posted on 08/25/2004 6:36:10 AM PDT by Dutchgirl (Gen. Tommy Franks,"We owe it to Osama to kill him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Very interesting. CO remains largely conservative with a popular conservative Governor in Owens, so I'd guess this measure will fail.


9 posted on 08/25/2004 6:36:21 AM PDT by Akira (Experience is a hard teacher, but fools will have no other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Akira
Never underestimate the ability of the masses to shoot themselves in the foot.



10 posted on 08/25/2004 6:44:57 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Akira
Governor Owens has already come out publicly calling for the defeat of this legislation. The people who came out for this initiative were supposedly from California, and man..were they pushing, I got into arguments with three of them on three separate occasions.."No, I am sorry, I don't agree with your position" was not acceptable to them. VERRRYYYY aggressive.
11 posted on 08/25/2004 6:58:31 AM PDT by coloradomomba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
This article was posted yesterday. One of the posters replying to it pointed out that the method of selecting electors must be determined by the state legislature, not by a referendum (and the Colorado legislature has already rejected this proposal).

See Article II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."

12 posted on 08/25/2004 7:19:01 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

This measure will fail and fail badly. Everybody sees through this thinly veiled attempted power grab.


13 posted on 08/25/2004 7:23:17 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
..must be determined by the state legislature, not by a referendum (and the Colorado legislature has already rejected this proposal) See Article II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."

I hope the voters know this. :/

14 posted on 08/25/2004 7:32:37 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Be aware of this. I haven't heard about it until now.


15 posted on 08/25/2004 7:33:11 AM PDT by SirChas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: coloradomomba
The people who came out for this initiative were supposedly from California, and man..were they pushing,

I bet they wouldn't be for this in Cal EE fornia.

16 posted on 08/25/2004 7:34:27 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Well, the Rats ignored this clause in the Constitution during their self-created Florida debacle...why would anyone expect them to adhere to this clause in Colorado or anywhere else?


17 posted on 08/25/2004 8:12:55 AM PDT by SAJ (Come Friday, write the LBX calls 70 dollars OOM. Statistically a huge favorite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

I do hope the CO GOP is going to fight this now and not just wait and hope that the referendum loses --

kind of like the way the national GOP approached McCain-Feingold -- they just sat back and hoped the SCOTUS would strike it down.


18 posted on 08/25/2004 8:25:00 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Burr for Senate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Like California, Colorado is an initiative state. It is relatively easy to get voter initiatives on the ballot but cheaper than in California as the population is much smaller. If this measure passes, the state constitution will be amended so the posted comment about the legislature casting the electoral college votes doesn't apply. And the measure specifies that it will take effect before the electors meet to vote on the 2004 election.

Colorado is not reliably conservative. Statewide elections can be very, very close. Big chunks of the Front Range are Democrat territory--Denver, Boulder, Fort Collins--and a lot of fuzzy thinkers everywhere believe in direct democracy/proportional representation no matter what. The Federalist Papers, with their emphasis on avoiding factionalism, are not much taught in Colorado public schools.

Proponents of this measure note that Gore would have won the last election had Colorado electoral votes been split. Just another way to ensure that one side wins.
19 posted on 08/25/2004 8:39:43 AM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl; Cacique; KellyAdmirer; Semper Paratus; rhinohunter; cosine; Rummyfan; Akira; trussell; ..
I wonder what novel attempt at thievery the donkeys are going to use to steal this particular election.

I guess I shouldn't worry, there are people at the DNC working around-the-clock on this pressing issue.

If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat

-Hugh Hewitt

20 posted on 08/25/2004 9:15:21 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (This tag-line paid for by "Friends of Paul Rodriguez.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson