Skip to comments.
Colorado Proposal Could Throw Election To Kerry
Gary Halbert - Forecasts & Trends Weekly E-Letter ^
| 8-25-2004
| Gar D. Halbert
Posted on 08/25/2004 6:25:07 AM PDT by Cacique
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Interesting piece from a mailing list I belong to. Seemed worthy of posting.
The RATS are trying to circumvent the way the constitution is supposed to work. So what's new?
1
posted on
08/25/2004 6:25:07 AM PDT
by
Cacique
To: MadIvan; nutmeg; The Scourge of Yazid; Clemenza; PARodrig; firebrand; NYC GOP Chick; rmlew; ...
Ping your ping lists if you have any.
2
posted on
08/25/2004 6:27:49 AM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
To: Cacique
Freeper
N. Theknow says:
"Its faster than a checkbook, more powerful than a Democratic demagogue, able to lay waste to a liar Kerry with the single click of a mouse. It's a little bird of truth, it's plain to see Kerry's unfit... it's... it's...SuperFReep!
Want to join in the fun?
Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!
3
posted on
08/25/2004 6:28:36 AM PDT
by
Chieftain
(Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
To: Cacique
I just got this
EXPOSE KERRY'S FRAUD SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH sticker on my truck yesterday afternoon.
Made by fellow FReeper disabled vet who has a bone to pick with Kerry, like we all do!
Large $20 (24" Wide 12" Tall) like mine
Small $10 (12" Wide 6" Tall)
Profits go to SwiftVets.com
FReep mail for details.
4
posted on
08/25/2004 6:28:56 AM PDT
by
Chieftain
(Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
To: Cacique
Split your votes, your state becomes all but overlooked in the election campaigning-- why would a candidate divert attention from a state where 51% gives them everything, to go to Colorado to try to get 60%? It's playing 'hard-to-get' when other states are more willing to put out.
5
posted on
08/25/2004 6:32:22 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: Cacique
How can they place this proposal on the upcoming November 2nd ballot, to have it take effect at the same time?
6
posted on
08/25/2004 6:32:33 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: Chieftain
Ahh same Jimmy I have. Mine is white and has the US flag and eagle on back.
7
posted on
08/25/2004 6:33:25 AM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
To: Cacique
In fact, while they are pushing hard to get the initiative on the ballot, they are also preparing to challenge it legally IF it doesnt work out in their favor (ie- Kerry wins). So the Democrats are for this iniative but planning to challenge against it? Makes perfect sense to me. I live in Florida and I've seen it before.
8
posted on
08/25/2004 6:36:10 AM PDT
by
Dutchgirl
(Gen. Tommy Franks,"We owe it to Osama to kill him.")
To: Cacique
Very interesting. CO remains largely conservative with a popular conservative Governor in Owens, so I'd guess this measure will fail.
9
posted on
08/25/2004 6:36:21 AM PDT
by
Akira
(Experience is a hard teacher, but fools will have no other.)
To: Akira
Never underestimate the ability of the masses to shoot themselves in the foot.
10
posted on
08/25/2004 6:44:57 AM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
To: Akira
Governor Owens has already come out publicly calling for the defeat of this legislation. The people who came out for this initiative were supposedly from California, and man..were they pushing, I got into arguments with three of them on three separate occasions.."No, I am sorry, I don't agree with your position" was not acceptable to them. VERRRYYYY aggressive.
To: Cacique
This article was posted yesterday. One of the posters replying to it pointed out that the method of selecting electors must be determined by the state legislature, not by a referendum (and the Colorado legislature has already rejected this proposal).
See Article II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."
To: Cacique
This measure will fail and fail badly. Everybody sees through this thinly veiled attempted power grab.
To: Verginius Rufus
..must be determined by the state legislature, not by a referendum (and the Colorado legislature has already rejected this proposal) See Article II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."I hope the voters know this. :/
14
posted on
08/25/2004 7:32:37 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: mad puppy
Be aware of this. I haven't heard about it until now.
15
posted on
08/25/2004 7:33:11 AM PDT
by
SirChas
To: coloradomomba
The people who came out for this initiative were supposedly from California, and man..were they pushing,I bet they wouldn't be for this in Cal EE fornia.
To: Verginius Rufus
Well, the Rats ignored this clause in the Constitution during their self-created Florida debacle...why would anyone expect them to adhere to this clause in Colorado or anywhere else?
17
posted on
08/25/2004 8:12:55 AM PDT
by
SAJ
(Come Friday, write the LBX calls 70 dollars OOM. Statistically a huge favorite.)
To: Cacique
I do hope the CO GOP is going to fight this now and not just wait and hope that the referendum loses --
kind of like the way the national GOP approached McCain-Feingold -- they just sat back and hoped the SCOTUS would strike it down.
18
posted on
08/25/2004 8:25:00 AM PDT
by
rhinohunter
(Burr for Senate!!!)
To: Semper Paratus
Like California, Colorado is an initiative state. It is relatively easy to get voter initiatives on the ballot but cheaper than in California as the population is much smaller. If this measure passes, the state constitution will be amended so the posted comment about the legislature casting the electoral college votes doesn't apply. And the measure specifies that it will take effect before the electors meet to vote on the 2004 election.
Colorado is not reliably conservative. Statewide elections can be very, very close. Big chunks of the Front Range are Democrat territory--Denver, Boulder, Fort Collins--and a lot of fuzzy thinkers everywhere believe in direct democracy/proportional representation no matter what. The Federalist Papers, with their emphasis on avoiding factionalism, are not much taught in Colorado public schools.
Proponents of this measure note that Gore would have won the last election had Colorado electoral votes been split. Just another way to ensure that one side wins.
19
posted on
08/25/2004 8:39:43 AM PDT
by
cosine
To: Dutchgirl; Cacique; KellyAdmirer; Semper Paratus; rhinohunter; cosine; Rummyfan; Akira; trussell; ..
I wonder what novel attempt at thievery the donkeys are going to use to steal this particular election.
I guess I shouldn't worry, there are people at the DNC working around-the-clock on this pressing issue.
If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat
-Hugh Hewitt
20
posted on
08/25/2004 9:15:21 AM PDT
by
The Scourge of Yazid
(This tag-line paid for by "Friends of Paul Rodriguez.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson