Upon hearing the news, Presidential candidate and hero John Kerry called American Paul Hamm to offer his congratulations for "winning" the gold.
To: School of Rational Thought
I dunno. If there was a mistake, a real mistake, it should be corrected. And it does seem there was a real mistake.
2 posted on
08/22/2004 10:28:42 AM PDT by
HarryCaul
To: School of Rational Thought
Three words: Roy Jones, Junior.
4 posted on
08/22/2004 10:32:55 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(...somebody had to say it...why not me?)
To: School of Rational Thought
What a bunch of irrational nonsense. They are saying it was supposed to be judged higher based on some criteria before the actual performance. Libnastics.
5 posted on
08/22/2004 10:41:40 AM PDT by
Jim_Curtis
(Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
To: School of Rational Thought
I predict that before the Olympics end, Paul Hamm will make the gesture of giving his gold medal to the other gymnast in a demonstration of the American spirit.
6 posted on
08/22/2004 10:47:06 AM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: School of Rational Thought
If Hamm is smart and after all the rulings are handed down, he should get together with the 2 Korea gymnasts & offer to swap medals. It would be a great gesture of sportsmanship & Hamm would get tremendous press for it. I know he worked hard for it, and the comback from the vault was heroic, but the Judges' error gave Hamm the gold and an asterix.
What's more valuable to Hamm: the Gold, or a Silver with a huge celebrity bump?
The only obstacle is that the Korean with the Silver would have to be willing to accept the Bronze. Don't know if he'd do that. Also, the governing bodies might suspend the gymnasts for such an unsanctioned deal.
I don't like this "give both a Gold". That was BS when they did it with the figure skaters, and it would be BS now. There can only be one winner.
9 posted on
08/22/2004 10:51:46 AM PDT by
Tallguy
(If Clinton did a good job stopping the Millenium Bomber, I've got 2 Towers in NYC to sell you...)
To: School of Rational Thought
Why isn't Al Gore asking for a recount?
11 posted on
08/22/2004 10:55:13 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: School of Rational Thought
They ought to have a do-over.
13 posted on
08/22/2004 11:03:59 AM PDT by
Tazlo
(I need to get a tagline)
To: School of Rational Thought
Did no one get my comment or was it just not funny? Too obscure?
Did no one see the connection between Kerry's medals and the gymnist medals?
To: School of Rational Thought
No one really knows what the S Korean score would have been if he had started with a difficulty of 10. To automatically say he should have another .1 point added to his score, because he started with 9.9, is wrong. The judges may have still given him the same score or maybe just a small bump higher, but not the full .1 of a point. No one will ever know. Also, Hamm went into his final routine knowing how well he needed to do to come in first, based on the error the judges made with the S Korean, but Hamm had no way of knowing his score was in error. Who is to say that maybe Hamm would have given just a little bit more effort if he knew ahead of time what the real score the S Korean would have had. I say leave the results the way they are. Judges make mistakes, just like everyone else. You cannot undo what has already been finalized. I just hope the S Korean is man enough to accept this and does not pull an Al Gore for many years to come.
24 posted on
08/22/2004 8:00:35 PM PDT by
rawhide
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson