John Kerry testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by William Fulbright, in April 1971. Photo UPI
Of course, I want Kerry to show what "proven falsehoods" there are in the book.
As, he has YET to be able to prove ANY...
John Kerry testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by William Fulbright, in April 1971. Photo UPI
Ha ha, they going to pull all of Moore's stuff too ?
New Swifty adv: http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfit_video2.html
Nice. International coverage of Kerry's Campaign stepping on a supersize banana peel.
Look out below...
Dick Clarke's pathetic book has been proven to contain falsehoods by the 911 commission; was it withdrawn? joe wilson's "yellow cake" op-ed piece has been proven to be founded upon one big lie; did the NYT retract it? joe wilson's subsequent book was based on assertions that were proven to be false before it was even published; was it published anyway? F911 is a proven pile of lies; will it still come out on DVD before the election?
why are hit jobs allowed against george bush, but not allowed against john kerry?
*gasps*
A Democrat advocating BOOK BANNING?
Say it isn't so!
</sarcasm>
This kind of strong-arm tactic has always increased interest in the book involved. I think it's a win-win for our side.
Of course the odds of the publisher withdrawing a #1 bestseller are, well, zero.
I still haven't been able to find my copy. My Borders store tells me that as soon as copies come in, they're sold out. It really looks like this is liberal bias, seeing that there were hundreds of unsold copies of the Clinton autobiography available. Surely you could reasonably predict a very high demand for a book that's received this kind of publicity?
D
Yet they continue to hype F911 as the gospel truth.
What a bunch of hypocrites!
The Kerry campaign has not specified a single false allegation in the book, AFAIK.
"Ich bin ein Waffen SS"
Maybe salon.com ought to withdraw itself...
Last Price Day Change Volume
$0.16 0.03 (-15.79%) 0
If photocopies of John Kerry's military records are in the book I would agree the book contains proven falsehoods.
CBS Radio introduced the new Swift Boat ad today with "The Republican-financed Swift Boat veterans..." Such a lie--they are not funded by the "Republicans", which would be illegal anyway. Unlike their allegations in this morning's NY Times, this is not coordinated by Karl Rove, as that would be illegal and if it were true, they would be demanding he be charged with a crime. If we said, "The Democrat-funded MoveOn.Org.", they would be outraged.
If Kerry really had nothing to hide, he would release his records like Bush did, rise above it, shut up, and move on.
BTW, how come nobody's demanding that he be charged with perjury as he lied about war crimes before a Congressional Committee?
WTF!? This is getting so goofy that I can't believe it....
But for some reason, such a call by Kerry is perfectly legitimate in the eyes of Leftists and their "mainstream" [sic] media.
In that case, sue for libel. See you in court Kerrystein.
Kerry and Edwards want to keep this controversy going through the RNC Convention. Why???
It's better for them than having to be confronted with their Far Left voting record in the U. S. Senate. If Kerry can portray himself as the "victim," he can keep it going. If his bluff is called and his records are made public, then he'll have to run on his Senate record (which should be the measure of what kind of President he'd make anyway).
As entertaining as all this is, Republicans are not doing the country a favor by enabling Kerry to pull this sham on the American people. He and the Liberal Senator from North Carolina should be forced TO RUN ON THEIR RECORDS. That is the only legitimate criteria for measuring their level of commitment to the defense of the nation. There's enough evidence from the last 20 years to label him as a person who does not speak truth, without going back to the 60's and 70's.
The call to silence the book reminds us of Hitler's burning of the books in the 1930's in Germany. What he was trying to do was to silence truth and the ideas of liberty in order that people would forget truth and not understand his real ambition: to assume power over the people.
