Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerACLUmember

By rough estimate, NY is about twice as far from the Canaries as London. Would London be destroyed in time to give NY lots of warning?


7 posted on 08/09/2004 8:41:17 PM PDT by per loin (This tagline has not been censored!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: per loin
By rough estimate, NY is about twice as far from the Canaries as London. Would London be destroyed in time to give NY lots of warning?

Yes and no. A smaller version of the tsunami would reach the UK first. The wave front, as I read it, gets greatly dissipated by the European Coast, the English Channel, the Thames Estuary, etc., so would not be as severe. Also I think the disintigrated flank of the volcano faces the East Coast of the US, so we would bear the full brunt of the mega-tsunami.

18 posted on 08/09/2004 8:46:47 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: per loin
By rough estimate, NY is about twice as far from the Canaries as London.

The difference is that when the wave hits the shore in England -- it will ravage the south-western coast (remember the western most part of Portugal and Spain would protect England to a large extent.

Lisbon may be hit, but if the landslide pushs waves out west from the islands they may not affect Europe too much at all. It would hit the Atlantic islands first.
100 posted on 08/10/2004 2:27:22 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson