Posted on 08/05/2004 10:12:47 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
NITED NATIONS, Aug. 1 When it comes to the movies, the United Nations has long played hard to get.
Filmmakers hoping to wrap their lenses around the cathedral-like spaces of this icon of midcentury aesthetic were always turned down, and that included Alfred Hitchcock, whose request to shoot "North by Northwest" on location in 1959 was rejected. Officials were not even swayed by the presence of Cary Grant, a leading man who could fill a pair of striped trousers more smartly than most.
When the director Sydney Pollack came calling last year with his new $80 million film, "The Interpreter," starring Nicole Kidman and Sean Penn, he too got the traditional veto. So he began work in Toronto on a soundstage lookalike of the grand meeting halls and the stylishly appointed lobbies, lounges and corridors, but it was a half-hearted and ultimately unnecessary effort.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Hollywood wants to give a big [sexual favor] to the U.N. Good guys: true believers in the U.N. Bad guys: corrupt corporations and the bureacrats they influence. Actual corruption originating in the U.N: zero. That's my guess, at least. The U.N. isn't known for its tolerance of dissent.
Didn't it go belly up after W won the 2004 election?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.