kerry in his phantom zone
Posted on 08/01/2004 12:22:40 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
Anti-Semites find a home in John Kerry's party
How does the Democratic Party do it? The party of Jim Crow, segregation, race baiting and the Ku Klux Klan still gets the black vote. At the same the same time this party of the super rich has successfully painted, with considerable help from the lying media, the Republicans as the real party of the rich.
It has done this while making sure that taxation for its politically bigoted super rich pals remains optional (Theresa Heinz Kerry: You pay taxes, I don't and John Edwards —will the real one please stand up). Once again, the partisan media played an important role, and still does, in hiding this squalid fact from public view.
Now the same party that turned hatred, bigotry and political mendacity into public virtues is courting the anti-Israeli (meaning anti-Jewish) Arab vote.
Forty-six Arab-American delegates were determined to have their say at the Democrats' Boston convention and swear undying loyalty to a party that American Jews poured millions of dollars into, and still do.
So what gives?
Shahid Khan, national finance co-chairman of the John Kerry for President Committee, claimed that the delegates will "mobilize American Muslims in the community and show our support to the Democratic Party."
How does he intend to "mobilize" this community? Well being a Democrat that means he intends to use hate, bigotry and lies, at least if the views of delegates Newman Abuissa, Taleb Salhab, Ferial Masry and Claudia Baba are taken at face value.
According to them President Bush unfairly singled out Arab-Americans after the 9-11 atrocity. This is an outrageous lie. The president went out of his way to reassure this community that there would be no singling out of Muslims or those of Arab descent.
In short, there would be no "profiling". This was done despite the fact that all of the 9-11 mass murderers were Arab Muslims. Now this community has got the nerve to falsely complain that it has been picked on.
Wallowing in its newly acquired status of victimhood it naturally turned to the unpatriotic Democrats for support.
Having decided that the fascist Bush (the moronic R. F. Kennedy's description) has been violating their civil rights, spokesmen for this community of fearless American patriots attacked the President for destroying Saddam's vicious regime and restoring the civil rights of the Iraqi people.
Reinforcing their public image of intrepid defenders of democracy these dedicated democrats also expressed moral outrage at Bush for not supporting the Palestinians' right to put bombs on Jewish school buses, murder Jewish women and their children, launch suicide bombing raids against Jewish restaurants, discos, pizza parlors, lynch Israeli soldiers, etc.
So Bush's real crime in the eyes of these patriotic humanitarians is that he defends the right of Israel, still the only democracy in the Middle East, to exist despite repeated attempts by Arab states to exterminate it.
The richness of the irony of the situation is that American Jews will foolishly continue to support a party that anti-Semites, pro-terrorists and Saddam supporters find increasingly attractive. (I guess this is what Dems mean by being inclusive).
The Arab American Institute is playing an important role in directing this support to the Kerry camp. James Zogby, a Democrat, is the founder and president of the institute. He is also a Saddam apologist. (No wonder he's a Kerry supporter).
Last year his piece How U.S. Manipulates News to Suit Its Interests was published in Saudi Arabia's Arab News, the country's only English language newspaper. Apart from his patently false claims about media manipulation by the White House, he brazenly lied by denying that Saddam had links to international terrorists.
Zogby's claim could only be true if he didn't count scum like Abu Nidal, Arafat and Zarqawi as terrorists. And he doesn't. In fact, he is so fond of Arab terrorists that he called Clinton's executive order banning donations to terrorist groups as comparable to "some of the worst abuses of the McCarthy era." He also thinks Israelis are a bunch of "Nazis".
What does it say about Kerry and his fellow Democrats that they value the services of this anti-Israeli bigot? And what does it say about the party's Jewish supporters that they cannot see the writing on the wall.
kerry in his phantom zone
Most rich people in general are for Kerry. The liberal media has have used the "Great Lie" method to prove that republicans are still the party of the rich(hasnt been true in almost 50 years).
The Republicans today are conservatives. They are Farmers, Truckers, Blue Collar workers, Small-Business owners, Religous people, etc...
The Democrats of today are leftists. They are Hollywood elites, Corporate Elites, Media Elites, Academic Elites, Old people, and (unfortunately, still)minorities.
Just telling the truth that everybody knows and nobody will say.
To-raisyore Taxes Kerry
Kerry did not mention Israel in his speech. Were their slams against "neo-cons"? I don't remember if Kerry was among the many disparagers of "neo-cons" which of course is code for Jew.
It's a big tent. I'm sure that the anti-semites are not the most obsequeous of Kerry's supporters.
"Most rich people in general are for Kerry."
You can document this? What is YOUR definition of Rich? (since you are making the claim)
You can document this? What is YOUR definition of Rich? (since you are making the claim)
There was an exit poll taken by cnn in 2000 showing that upper-income(above $100,000 a year i beleive) voters favored Gore by a fairly significant margin. That margin has surely widened... as Bush has populist appeal, and Kerry is a New England snob who has especially strong support among wealthy leftists. Also... just use your common sense. All of the lowest-income states voted for Bush, all of the highest-income states voted for Gore. The liberal media can not cover this up forever.
A comment I read from Kerry was" My policy on Israel is the same as Bush's". BEtcha he does not know what Bush's policy is.
This is because, as Reverand Al says, "they be riding the don-key for all they can get..." Amazing that blacks don't pay any attention to what the real record of Democrats has been -- how their liberal policies have left generations of blacks "in the back of the bus."
It also amazes me that Dems just assume they have the Jewish vote when there are so many anti-Semites in that party. I suppose it goes back to the Republicans having the solid support of the Christian Coalition -- although I doubt Israel has a better friend than among conservative Christians.
If these dependable Democrat voting blocks ever wake up and reconsider the record, the Democrats will be ready for the dustbin of history.
bttt
What does bttt mean?
I don't know how you came up with your list. Cetainly, older people are the most conservative of all groups and the least likely to vote for a Democrat for President.
And then there is this:
According to them President Bush unfairly singled out Arab-Americans after the 9-11 atrocity. This is an outrageous lie. The president went out of his way to reassure this community that there would be no singling out of Muslims or those of Arab descent.There was and still is a certain amount of profiling. The terrorism watch lists, the arrests of terror suspects--this all hit Arabs disproportionately. There is no way we can conduct an effective WoT without stepping on Arab toes. So when Arabs squeal about their toes being stepped on, don't tell them it's "an outrageous lie," tell 'em it's the way things ought to be!
The real truth--US Jewry (at least the liberal majority) to Israel--"Drop Dead." This is a bitter pill to swallow--because I don't see how much support the US can give to Israel with Kerry as prez. I read so often that the GOP has hopes of getting more Jewish votes because our side has been so unrelentingly pro-Israel..but what if the awful truth is that most US Jews want Israel just to dry up and disappear? Sure looks like it from where I sit. That just gives them more reason to vote for Kerry-- And without US support, Israel may not die, but she'll really hurt.
And maybe some people sick of the neos have some good reasons to be. Google up "Balkans neoconservative" and see how healthy you feel after you read what some neocons (who include McVain in their numbers) have wrought.
bttt = bump to the top (pushes the thread to the top of the page so it will get seen by more people)
I beg to differ. I am a member of the richest family in America and anti-Semitism is not tolerated in our circle.
Cetainly, older people are the most conservative of all groups and the least likely to vote for a Democrat for President.
This is exactly what I'm talking about! The media gives that impression but it is absolutely not true. Look at ANY poll this election season that has an age breakdown. 65+ is THE MOST democrat/kerry voting age group, with the possible exception of 18-29's.
"I beg to differ."
I'm not sure what you are begging to differ with, since I never accused rich people of being anti-semitic. I was just referring to the writers comment that Democrats call Republicans the party of the rich when in fact it is the Dems who are that party.
Interesting to hear about your family... without getting too personal(unless you wish to), what is your families fortune from?
I am an adopted son. I was grafted on to the family tree of King David.
Israeli royalty eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.