Skip to comments.
CIA report reveals U.S. knew Saudi-backed charities tied to terrorism in 1996
Center for Security Policy ^
| July 31st, 2004
Posted on 07/31/2004 4:43:16 PM PDT by Sabertooth
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: RedBloodedAmerican
| Or did we allow Al to come in contact? Thats probably all that needs to be said about it, IMO.
Can you be serious? You think your hint that candidate Bush was part of some elaborate sting operation to snare Al Arian and Alamoudi is "probably all that needs to be said about it?" Well then, I imagine that President Clinton was aiding the investigation of arms merchants and drug dealers in those pics at the White House coffees. Right? Try applying Occam's Razor, and those scenarios won't appear too plausible.
|
To: Sabertooth
Nope. You are putting words I never said into my meaning. No offense, but I don't think you get it.
But to note: Bush is free and clear in all of this.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Nope. You are putting words I never said into my meaning. No offense, but I don't think you get it.
Feel free to make yourself more understood. But to note: Bush is free and clear in all of this.
No kidding. That's always been stipulated. It's those who have introduced Bush to so many terror symps that are the problem.
|
To: Sabertooth
However, the 2000 date of the meeting between Candidate Bush, Khaled Saffuri, and Abdurahman Alamoudi doesn't get those in charge of Bush's Muslim Outreach off the hook. I agree with your larger point here. Candidate Bush meeting with these guys pre-9/11 doesn't bother me as much as President Bush meeting with them post-9/11, but it's a big mistake either way.
44
posted on
07/31/2004 7:19:47 PM PDT
by
AzJohn
To: RedBloodedAmerican
But the muslim>museum thing left fingerprints. This was before 9/11 that it happened. Has anyone ever checked to see what Hillary's known contributors have been up to after financing her senatorial campaign? I get strange google activity when I try to search it but it might just be my virus corrupted computer that is at fault.
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the clarification Saber. I can't help but think that the Saudi well has always run very deep into Washington politics, in both parties, and this isn't a good thing for America.
To: Shermy
47
posted on
07/31/2004 10:41:03 PM PDT
by
Fedora
To: Sabertooth
48
posted on
08/01/2004 1:19:50 AM PDT
by
AnimalLover
((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?))
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
49
posted on
08/01/2004 6:08:32 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(My opponent has good intentions, but intentions do not always translate to results, GWB)
To: Balkans; Destro; Valin; joan
50
posted on
08/01/2004 7:29:27 PM PDT
by
DTA
To: DTA
51
posted on
08/02/2004 1:20:38 PM PDT
by
technochick99
(Sanctimonious prig, proudly posting and criticizing (except the FRN) since 1999.)
To: SJackson
Why was Saber banned?
WTF is going on?
52
posted on
08/14/2004 11:15:45 AM PDT
by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson