Or "Do I detect the smell of burning martyr?"
Posted on 07/30/2004 12:04:43 PM PDT by jwalburg
Much that is commonly "understood" among journalists is rarely voiced in public. A pre-convention event this week in Cambridge -- where network anchors went on the record about the partisan and corporate pressures they feel -- was a bracing exception. The Shorenstein Center program was mostly noted in the news for Jim Lehrer's chastisement of the big three anchors for their stinted convention coverage. But even rarer was the theme kicked off by Dan Rather at the start: "Fear has increased in every newsroom in America." The three anchors (Rather, Peter Jennings, and Tom Brokaw) sparred with one another about whether it was "fear," "caution," or "anxiety," but its existence seemed clear.
Rather started by noting this: When you're a reporter contrasting what someone in the administration says with what you know to be the facts, pointedly laying out the differences, "You're gonna catch hell." "And those who are willing to pay the price," Rather said, are fewer today than before. In a later remark, he said the strong feelings nationwide and the guarantee that they'll be voiced not only calls up more caution than ever -- sometimes a good thing -- but causes some to ask: "You know what? We run this story, we're asking for trouble. Why do it?"
Peter Jennings, having rejected fear, said shortly thereafter, "I think there is anxiety in the newsroom, and I think it comes from the corporate suite." He hears more from conservative critics than in the past, he said, and "I think it creates concern in the corporate suites. This wave of resentment rushes at our advertisers, it rushes at our corporate suites, and it gets under the newsroom's skin."
RELATED RESOURCES Learn more about leadership in one of our seminars.
Sign up to receive Journalism Junction by e-mail: * Click here (sent Fridays at 11 a.m.)
Then it was Rather's turn to demur, saying that had "not been (his) experience at CBS News, at least in recent years." To which Jennings responded: "I can take on anything. But I feel a presence of anger in the air all the time."
Tom Brokaw soft-pedaled this angle, noting that there had previously been "a kind of tyranny of the left" that only naturally had been succeeded by its opposite. But when the three were pressed by Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) about what they would have done differently in the coverage of the run-up to war in Iraq, the original topic revived.
Judy Woodruff cited "voices listened to but not given the prominence of the flood of voices from the administration." She described a "hyper-patriotic ... mood that had taken hold to some degree in the media."
Rather went further with the specific results: "We did not do our job of pressing and asking enough questions often enough." He said there is "more reluctance now than 35 to 40 years ago to stand up and look 'em in the eye and ask the hard questions."
Brokaw said he thought "the big failure" was that "we didn't connect enough dots. We didn't raise enough questions about the political process."
"Where are the hearings in the House? Where are the hearings in the Senate?" he asked.
Lehrer's only comment on the topic: The fact that views today are "strongly held is terrific for us," he said, because "viewers will watch with more vigor."
Woodruff's thought about the powerful partisan outpourings: "We want to be responsive, but it can never govern what we do."
As the ensuing debate acknowledged, the country's political mood, translated through the corporate suites, HAS been affecting what the media was doing. Here's hoping the welcome level of candor in Cambridge is a signal that this is ceasing to be true.
Problem is right here.
More correct title would be "Fear and Loathing".
You mean the stories of rebuilding Iraq? The schools, medical facilities, power plants? Businesses?
Yeah, Dan. I'm sure you'd hate to run those stories...you jackass.
These people either never watch TV or are dillusional.
I vote dillusional.
How very self-important.
Leftwing knucklehead.
I vote delusional....
This is actually a very positive development. It tells us that finally the public is getting to the mainstream leftest media.
A few more seasons may bring more conservatives into these broadcast news outlets. Jennings, Rather, Woodruff and others need to be retired pronto.
Yeah, we need hard-nosed reporters like Dan Rather than don't kowtow to anybody, and are willing to be aggressive with the administration.
"Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. President. If we could be one-one-hundredth as great as you and Hillary Rodham Clinton have been together in the White House, we'd take it right now and walk away winners." -- Dan Rather, May 1993
We have these a-holes on the run. Let's double the pressure all the while we triple it towards the pols.
Did anyone catch what Peter Jennings said right at the conclusion of Kerry's acceptance speech. This is as close as I can remember.
"If there were any doubts about Kerry's ability to take over as commander in chief, that speech just satisfied those doubts."
Stephanopils then chimed in with something to the effect, "That was a blistering challenge the Republicans are going to have a very hard time addressing."
Or "Do I detect the smell of burning martyr?"
Prior to the advent of the high technology & communications era, the Left virtually owned America's media. Excepting a paltry few hard-copy journals such as 'National Review', the Left dictated to America what we could know and how we were to think about what they allowed us to know. Enter the telecommunications era with talk radio and then the cyber-world information highway and the Left's "wall of silence" began springing leaks. The leaks have led to a backlash by Americans who came to realize that they'd been deceived.
It's this backlash that has Rather, Jennings, etal scared. The old regime is dying. And none too soon......good riddance!!
Interesting admission on Brokaw's part (though we're still waiting for a sign of "tyranny of the right").
"Rather went further with the specific results: "We did not do our job of pressing and asking enough questions often enough."
This is EXACTLY how the Kerry campaign, and Kerry the candidate, is being covered.
What Rather is really saying is "If we had known we could gin up opposition to the war so quickly, we would have started trashing it sooner in our coverage." The press supported the war early on, because taking a contra position would have been risky.
No doubt!!! Delusional!!!
LLS
"But I feel a presence of anger in the air all the time."
As they should.They've abandoned journalism and want to be political players. They have betrayed and destroyed public confidence in the press.
Jennings also referred to edweirds as the Vice President..... TWICE!!!!!
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.