Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus

That's interesting that you read it like that. I read the article implied that children are getting fatter, poverty rates for children have increased, birth rates for teens have dropped and so forth. I never read that being fat was a direct result of being poor. Maybe you should contact the editor to have them correct the article so it can support your claim. Or have the people that commissioned the study clarify their results. You have made this article an issue of race baiting and unfotunately refuse to be enlightened on what you have done.


14 posted on 07/28/2004 8:26:54 AM PDT by rave123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: rave123
You seem to be enlightened by nit- picking and reading between the lines making issues out of non issues. As I said before, it was a federal report citing the correlation between race, poverty and obesity.

Citations from the article:

The report said Mexican-American boys were at the highest risk, with 27 percent overweight followed by black, non-Hispanic girls at 23 percent.

The child obesity issue is a major cause for concern, Alexander said. "This is a trend that's been at work since 1980 ... and as a trend, it shows no sign of reversing," Alexander said.

Child poverty also grew, reaching 11.6 million in 2002, compared with 11.2 million a year earlier.

The report today by the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics >>

 Federal, as I said, write your congressman.

15 posted on 07/28/2004 9:12:30 AM PDT by Coleus (Brooke Shields killed her children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson