Al Qaeda Messages Posted on U.S. Server

washingtonpost.com ^ | Tuesday, July 13, 2004; 7:22 PM | By David McGuire

[Golden Eagle]

Bump! Guess what they're running?

It's particularly disgusting watching someone like you gloat over the success of Al Queda in hacking US websites.

Which is exacty what you are doing. Nevermind the fact that patches certainly already exist for whatever vulnerability was exploited, or that the admins didn't protect their FTP configuration or passwords. No, you'd rather jump around and cheer, apparently.

[watchwoman]

"...and don't fergit Bills Presidential Liebrary"

In Arkansas, wouldn't that be liebary?

[Salo]

You posted an article claiming that since the democrats run websites on linux, all linux users must be leftists/democrats. Using your "logic," all windows users must be islamic terrorists. If that sounds stupid to you, you're learning - much more than anyone ever hoped for.

[Golden Eagle]

You posted an article claiming that since the democrats run websites on linux, all linux users must be leftists/democrats.

That's not what article said nor did I, my point is consistently that "Democrats", socialists, and communists the world over are rallying behind open source products like Linux to the point of passing laws requiring some to use it. And there's plenty of proof of it, while your only laughable defense of them is to claim all Windows users must be islamic terrorists when there's obviously no relation. Your buddy JunkYard is now down to cheering on Al Queda when they hack Microsoft based websites. It would be funny if it wasn't so repulsive.

[ErnBatavia]

[TechJunkYard]

(See what I mean?)

[TechJunkYard]

No glee here, dude. Just an observation. As a security professional, I don't like seeing any box getting cracked.

Amazing how you can read stuff that isn't there.

[Golden Eagle]

BS. Everyone saw your gleeful "Bump!"

[Paladin2]

" If that sounds stupid to you, you're learning"

LMAO. True 'dat.

[TechJunkYard]

[eyeroll]... Just bumping the thread is all.

[Cronos]

And there's plenty of proof of it, while your only laughable defense of them is to claim all Windows users must be islamic terrorists when there's obviously no relation

Nope, he's just using YOUR logic. You state that since an O/S is used by group X (along with a number of other people), that means that ALL people belong to group X.

As you say: If Set A(Dims) belong to set B (Linux users), that means that Set C, D, E... (all other groups) that belong to set B are also members of Set A. That is illogical and WRONG.

If you state that, then by using YOUR logic we come up with: since group A (AlQ)belongs to group B (win users), that means that sets C, D, E... (all other gorups) that belong to set B (Windows users) are also members of Set A.

That's YOUR logic.