Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

It sounds as if the administration has a tin ear when it comes to listening to social consevratives and there can really be only one reason for that. They don't really believe in what we stand for.

There was certainly no problem with Reagan reaching social conservatives. And Reagan didn't have slam dunk issues like gay marriage to fall back on.


7 posted on 07/12/2004 12:21:46 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (Ronald Reagan - Greatest President of the 20th Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tall_Texan
Reagan stiff armed the social conservatives. He was good at paying lip service to them but that was it.

Religious social conservatives scare the hell out of many many moderate Republicans because if they become the predominant voice in the party, the Republicans are doomed to lose nationally.

29 posted on 07/12/2004 1:21:00 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan
It sounds as if the administration has a tin ear when it comes to listening to social consevratives and there can really be only one reason for that. They don't really believe in what we stand for.

They would believe in what we stand for if it would get them votes, but let's face it, many of the issues you and I believe in are too divisive or seen negatively by many who are in the middle.

I'm not saying it's right, it's just the reality. The GOP can't afford to do anything that could cost them votes in key segments.

77 posted on 07/12/2004 7:27:37 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson