Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Steinberg blames cities for impasse
Sac Bee ^ | 7/10/04 | Alexa H. Bluth

Posted on 07/10/2004 9:21:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg of Sacramento, a key Democratic player in budget talks, on Friday blamed a band of shopping mall-heavy cities for holding up budget negotiations over the matter of protecting their bank accounts.

Steinberg said he and other lawmakers, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and local government groups agree that city and county treasuries must be protected in the state constitution.

But he said cities, in particular those paying their bills from large sales tax bases, are asking for too much, to the possible peril of other government services, and are balking at important changes to the system through which the state distributes taxes to local governments.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: blames; calgov2002; cities; impasse; steinberg

1 posted on 07/10/2004 9:21:31 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; california

lol.. It's just never enough.


2 posted on 07/10/2004 9:22:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

One for you.


3 posted on 07/10/2004 9:29:10 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly gutless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Maybe the state should start buying some of their own lottery tickets.


4 posted on 07/10/2004 9:41:16 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Democrats are holding up a budget to avoid spending cuts next year. If local governments are guaranteed funds, that means less pork for Democratic special interest groups and the party's other constituencies. That's what is at the heart of the current impasse in Sacramento.


5 posted on 07/10/2004 9:57:21 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
One for you.

More than happy to run with the ball. The state, as well as many younger Freepers have a very short memory.

Within my life time the property taxes/use fees collected within the local government boundaries by local governments were substantially the exclusive revenue of local governments and the state got involved only to 1) help make taxation more uniform across California 2) administer the program for a small fee.

A Democrat administration, Pat Brown's (principally through the manipulations of Jesse Unruh), changed that basic concept and about thirty years later a Republican administration, Pete Wilson's, simply began the wholesale diversion of locally collected tax/fee revenues to the state's General Fund.

As an example if the state simply let local governments keep as little as 30% of the property taxes they collected to do with as they pleased (pre 1965) there would be no argument today. There would simply be an insolvent state government....as logic dictates it should be.

6 posted on 07/10/2004 10:17:14 PM PDT by Amerigomag (What's wrong with the US....three little letters......FDR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson