1 posted on
07/06/2004 8:44:16 PM PDT by
Mulder
To: *bang_list
According to the antis, here is a woman that did everything "right".
She didn't carry a gun for self defense, and instead went to the police station when she feared for her life. Only the station was "closed for business".
Now she is dead.
People need to learn that they, and they alone, are responsible for their safety.
Even the Ocala police chief was honest enough to admit that even if an officer had been on duty, they might not have been able to save her life.
2 posted on
07/06/2004 8:46:59 PM PDT by
Mulder
(To be born free is an accident,to live free is your duty,to die free is your obligation. Wm. Coulter)
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
When I was in California, when events like this occurred, we used to point out to anti-gun people how that the police are not legally required to protect anyone, as outlined in CALIFORNIA CODES, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 844-846. People used to be utterly surprised to find this out, having bought the BS that "the police are there to protect you".
I am currently looking for a similar set of codes for the state of Florida. I know these must exist, since every state has protected itself in this fashion. Can anyone offer any pointers to this section of the Florida state code?
Thanks,
7 posted on
07/07/2004 6:17:00 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson