Posted on 07/06/2004 8:09:09 PM PDT by Hildy
Senator Kerry has selected former trial lawyer Senator John Edwards as his running mate. Jim Copland covers on PointOfLaw. Overlawyered has had extensive coverage of Edwards's career and fund-raising (Feb. 26; Feb. 3; Feb. 2; Jan. 26; Jan. 23; Jan. 20; Sep. 16; pre-July 2003; and links therein). The Chamber of Commerce is so distressed by the selection that the Wall Street Journal reports that it may abandon its traditional stance of neutrality to campaign against the Kerry-Edwards ticket. (Alan Murray, "Business Elite Vows To Take On Kerry If He Taps Edwards", Wall Street Journal, Jul. 6) (via Kaus). Murray suggests that Edwards could allay fears that he's in the pockets of the plaintiffs' bar by joining the bipartisan support for class action reform (see Mar. 16 and links therein). To do so, however, Edwards would have to flip-flop his previous opposition to the Class Action Fairness Act; he consistently voted against reforms in committee. (Senate Report 108-123).
Posted by Ted Frank at July 6, 2004 11:11 AM | TrackBack
bump
Michael Petruzello is a lobbyist, registered foreign agent and the manager of Qorvis Communications. That firm was hired by Saudi Arabia on November 14, 2001 (just 2 months after 9-11) to counter criticism of the Arab kingdom.
On May 17, 2002, Petruzello offered to buy Edwards' Washington home -- which had been on the market for over a year -- for 3.52 million dollars. (Edwards paid 2.2 million for it in 1999.) The deal later fell through but Edwards still has the $100,000 deposit. He says he hasn't decided whether to keep it, and would only have to report the conflict of interest if he does so. The house eventually sold for $3 million, a full $500,000 less than the Saudi agent offered.
The Edwards claims he had no idea Petruzzello worked for the Saudis, but in the weeks before the offer Petruzzello visited Edwards home state of North Carolina with the Saudis as part of their publicity campaign, and he was widely quoted in Washington and national publications describing his work for the Saudis. His firm even ran pro-Saudi TV ads in 20 large markets including North Carolina (and other states from which Senate Intelligence Committee members came.)
Kent Cooper, the former head of the government's public disclosure office for federal candidates, said " The potential conflict of interest is readily apparent when a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence receives $100,000 in a real or sham business deal with a foreign agent or a person with extensive foreign contracts at teh same time the Senate is investigating possible lapses in national security."
2.)Highly Suspicious Campaign Contributions John Edwards, who is himself a lawyer, has received tons of campaign money from law firms. Nothing illegal or particularly wrong about that, however you may feel about lawyers.
But many of them show strong signs of being illegal contributions designed to evade limits on the amount of contributions, by having employees and spouses "contribute" money that a wealthy lawyer wanted to give. Other campaigns have used these practices; Bob Dole's national campaign co-chairman was convicted of the practice in 1996.
There are several cases described in "The Hill" (a magazine about Congress) where low-paid paralegals who had never contributed to campaigns before, and weren't registered to vote (or were even Republicans) gave the maximum $2,000 donation to Edwards. So did their spouse and several other people at the law firm where they work. Two had even filed bankruptcy recently.
We can't prove these people were helping their bosses give more than the $2,000 maximum. But, as Bill Allison of the non-partisan Center for Public Integrity said, It seems on the surface very suspicious. I think it is somewhat questionable that people who have never donated before would suddenly donate $2,000, he said.
In one case there IS direct evidence that such an employee was illegally contributing for her boss. Michelle Abu-Halmeh, a legal assistant at Turner & Associates in Arkansas, told The Washington Post in April of 2003 that she expected to be reimbursed by her boss for her $2,000 contribution. The Department of Justice has begun a criminal investigation of the case.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sources Saudi connection -- "Edwards House Sale Raises Questions", The Oregonian (from AP), November 1, 2003 pA4
Contributions -- "Donations to Sen. Edwards questioned," By Sam Dealey , The Hill (a non-partisan magazine about Congress), May 7, 2003
http://www.hillnews.com/news/050703/edwards.aspx
Here's some more!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1088175/posts
You guys are such a resource. I cant wait to go to lunch tomorrow with all my lib buds.
Hot diggity dog. This needs distributing far and wide. I'm going to do my part. Thanks!
Disgusting.
And there are articles out here that prove that he won a couple of these big cases on faulty medical testimony.
But he got his 50 percent.
http://www.issues2000.org/John_Edwards.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1088175/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1166194/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1166348/posts
Keep reading these links...it gets worse. What I'm hoping comes out of this is a new dialogue in the country about these horrible class action law suits. They are hurting us so much. Now that there's a face attached to it, maybe some good will come of it. Well, I can dream, can't I?
I've read them all; he's MY senator, remember? Not that you'd ever know it.
I was wondering about what you said today; it seems to me there should be a way to link companies/doctors, etc. laying off people to these outrageous lawsuits.
If we could do that, we could lay the lack of jobs right at this guy's feet, don't you think?
But he'll raise our taxes... and sent stormtroopers looking for you if you don't pay.Press Here For More
Isn't it North Carolina that has that horrible Dr. Crisis going on (because of malpractice insurance)...or do I have the wrong State?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.