Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush plans to screen whole US population for mental illness
Bmj Journals ^ | 19 June, 2004 | Jeanne Lenzer

Posted on 07/04/2004 6:39:03 PM PDT by SkyRat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
Final Report is here: http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/toc.html
1 posted on 07/04/2004 6:39:04 PM PDT by SkyRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyRat

I really wish Bush would stick to being a Republican.


2 posted on 07/04/2004 6:41:24 PM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

this is from the Onion, right?


3 posted on 07/04/2004 6:43:46 PM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
Bush plans to screen whole US population for mental illness

Simple really. Are they voting for Kerry or Nader ?

4 posted on 07/04/2004 6:44:49 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat

bttt


5 posted on 07/04/2004 6:45:01 PM PDT by netmilsmom ("We haven't begun military action. the world will know when we do." -Marine in Fallujah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat

So long as they start in Congress, and the courts.


6 posted on 07/04/2004 6:45:12 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
But Dr Graham Emslie, who helped develop the Texas project, defends screening: "There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene... and change their trajectory."

I do not like the sound of that.

7 posted on 07/04/2004 6:45:38 PM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

I agree. It would appear to be a violation of right to privacy??

Maybe there is a misunderstanding of this plan....I cannot fathom anyone wanting to spend taxpayer dollars on that much expensive testing....besides people have good and bad days, you wouldn't get a true perspective.


8 posted on 07/04/2004 6:45:48 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
BAD idea! They did the same thing for homosexuals in the '80's, because they weren't considered "violent." They're totally insane and now attempting to destroy the whole country from within. They even have organizations trying to legalize boy rape!
Instead of letting the insane like the homosexuals out, they should be rounding them back up and putting them back in.
Bush is an idiot for even suggesting doing it again after the first failure. Doing it again is a national death wish.
9 posted on 07/04/2004 6:46:22 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67; SkyRat

This is a very biased article.

Just because it's published at a medicl site, doesn't mean it's fair.

Even at worst --- some commission made the recommendation, Bush did not agree with this or propose it.


10 posted on 07/04/2004 6:46:27 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
Is opposition to gay marriage a "mental illness"?
11 posted on 07/04/2004 6:46:42 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Require congresscritters to wear full-face motorcycle helmets when Congres is in session. (Soft heads, you know.)


12 posted on 07/04/2004 6:47:05 PM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
From the Legal Information Institute, Cornell University - http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/privacy.html.

In all of its forms, however, the right of privacy must be balanced against the state's compelling interests. Such compelling interests include the promotion of public morality, protection of the individual's psychological health, and improving the quality of life.

13 posted on 07/04/2004 6:48:46 PM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
Drug companies have fared exceedingly well under the Bush administration, according to the centre's spokesperson, Steven Weiss.

Thank God for drug companies. Without them, many would have died needlessly. I'm glad they're on our side. Pro-life is a good thing.

14 posted on 07/04/2004 6:49:45 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Hmmm,,wonder how many of us will be flagged,,for some reason this has me laughing hysterically. Actually there have been huge studies documenting the incidence and prevalence of mental illness already. Are these jokers suggesting we identify people individually and target the poor guys for treatment? If so, I think this is one of those ideas some eighth gradeer conceives for his health class essay to the amazement of his politically correct parents who think, "what a genius".


15 posted on 07/04/2004 6:50:32 PM PDT by cajungirl (<i>swing low, sweet limousine, comin' fer to Kerry me hoooommmee</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

Imagine if they did "early screening" of Internet sites...


16 posted on 07/04/2004 6:51:21 PM PDT by 185JHP ( "Who is this King of Glory? The Lord strong and mighty, invincible in battle."u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat

What's my prize when I win?

:)


17 posted on 07/04/2004 6:52:45 PM PDT by bannie (Liberal Media: The Most Dangerous Enemies to America and Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

This sounds like one of those Presidential commissions that issue a report and then it gets filed under "A" for Asswhipe.


18 posted on 07/04/2004 6:53:18 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
Imagine if they did "early screening" of Internet sites...

ROTFLMAO

There's a lot of DUmmies out there eh?

19 posted on 07/04/2004 6:54:04 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

The Republican Party likes central planning now?


20 posted on 07/04/2004 6:54:04 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson