Skip to comments.
Bush plans to screen whole US population for mental illness
Bmj Journals ^
| 19 June, 2004
| Jeanne Lenzer
Posted on 07/04/2004 6:39:03 PM PDT by SkyRat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Final Report is here: http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/toc.html
1
posted on
07/04/2004 6:39:04 PM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: SkyRat
I really wish Bush would stick to being a Republican.
To: bikepacker67
this is from the Onion, right?
3
posted on
07/04/2004 6:43:46 PM PDT
by
corkoman
(Logged in - have you?)
To: SkyRat
Bush plans to screen whole US population for mental illness Simple really. Are they voting for Kerry or Nader ?
To: SkyRat
5
posted on
07/04/2004 6:45:01 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
("We haven't begun military action. the world will know when we do." -Marine in Fallujah)
To: SkyRat
So long as they start in Congress, and the courts.
To: SkyRat
But Dr Graham Emslie, who helped develop the Texas project, defends screening: "There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene... and change their trajectory."I do not like the sound of that.
7
posted on
07/04/2004 6:45:38 PM PDT
by
AM2000
To: bikepacker67
I agree. It would appear to be a violation of right to privacy??
Maybe there is a misunderstanding of this plan....I cannot fathom anyone wanting to spend taxpayer dollars on that much expensive testing....besides people have good and bad days, you wouldn't get a true perspective.
8
posted on
07/04/2004 6:45:48 PM PDT
by
Kackikat
To: SkyRat
BAD idea! They did the same thing for homosexuals in the '80's, because they weren't considered "violent." They're totally insane and now attempting to destroy the whole country from within. They even have organizations trying to legalize boy rape!
Instead of letting the insane like the homosexuals out, they should be rounding them back up and putting them back in.
Bush is an idiot for even suggesting doing it again after the first failure. Doing it again is a national death wish.
9
posted on
07/04/2004 6:46:22 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: bikepacker67; SkyRat
This is a very biased article.
Just because it's published at a medicl site, doesn't mean it's fair.
Even at worst --- some commission made the recommendation, Bush did not agree with this or propose it.
10
posted on
07/04/2004 6:46:27 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: SkyRat
Is opposition to gay marriage a "mental illness"?
11
posted on
07/04/2004 6:46:42 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Just mythoughts
Require congresscritters to wear full-face motorcycle helmets when Congres is in session. (Soft heads, you know.)
To: Kackikat
From the Legal Information Institute, Cornell University -
http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/privacy.html.
In all of its forms, however, the right of privacy must be balanced against the state's compelling interests. Such compelling interests include the promotion of public morality, protection of the individual's psychological health, and improving the quality of life.
13
posted on
07/04/2004 6:48:46 PM PDT
by
AM2000
To: SkyRat
Drug companies have fared exceedingly well under the Bush administration, according to the centre's spokesperson, Steven Weiss.Thank God for drug companies. Without them, many would have died needlessly. I'm glad they're on our side. Pro-life is a good thing.
14
posted on
07/04/2004 6:49:45 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: FairOpinion
Hmmm,,wonder how many of us will be flagged,,for some reason this has me laughing hysterically. Actually there have been huge studies documenting the incidence and prevalence of mental illness already. Are these jokers suggesting we identify people individually and target the poor guys for treatment? If so, I think this is one of those ideas some eighth gradeer conceives for his health class essay to the amazement of his politically correct parents who think, "what a genius".
15
posted on
07/04/2004 6:50:32 PM PDT
by
cajungirl
(<i>swing low, sweet limousine, comin' fer to Kerry me hoooommmee</i>)
To: AM2000
Imagine if they did "early screening" of Internet sites...
16
posted on
07/04/2004 6:51:21 PM PDT
by
185JHP
( "Who is this King of Glory? The Lord strong and mighty, invincible in battle."u)
To: SkyRat
What's my prize when I win?
:)
17
posted on
07/04/2004 6:52:45 PM PDT
by
bannie
(Liberal Media: The Most Dangerous Enemies to America and Freedom)
To: AM2000
This sounds like one of those Presidential commissions that issue a report and then it gets filed under "A" for Asswhipe.
18
posted on
07/04/2004 6:53:18 PM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
To: 185JHP
Imagine if they did "early screening" of Internet sites...ROTFLMAO
There's a lot of DUmmies out there eh?
19
posted on
07/04/2004 6:54:04 PM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: bikepacker67
The Republican Party likes central planning now?
20
posted on
07/04/2004 6:54:04 PM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson