Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force testing robot guard vehicles
SiliconValley.com ^ | 06/23/04 | N/A

Posted on 06/27/2004 7:26:31 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Air Force testing robot vehicles for guard duty

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla., (AP) -- The Air Force wants to take away Staff Sgt. Miguel Jimenez's job, and that's just fine by him.

The Miami airman was plucked from his normal security duties at nearby Tyndall Air Force Base to help test whether a robotic vehicle can take the place of humans in guarding air bases and troops.

``If somebody wants to spend the money and send something like that out there instead of my life, I'm all about that,'' Jimenez said Tuesday of the robots that cost from $200,000 to $500,000.

One robot being tested is a Jeep-size, four-wheeled vehicle that has been equipped with radar, television cameras and an infrared scan to detect people, vehicles and other objects. It carries a breadbox-sized mini-robot that can be launched to search under vehicles, inside buildings and other small places.

Another robot is fashioned from an off-the-shelf, four-wheeled all-terrain vehicle, giving it added versatility because a human also can ride it like a normal ATV. Both vehicles can be remotely operated from laptop computers and can be equipped with remotely fired weapons, like an M-16 rifle or pepper spray.

``What we are hoping is the robots will actually detect the enemy first,'' said Capt. Adolfo Meana Jr., chief of the concepts division for the Force Protection Battlelab at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas.

``If you shoot the robot we don't care. We know you're there, you're hostile, and we can keep our forces in reserve to move tactically against the enemy. The robots will save our troops' lives,'' he said.

The vehicles can be programmed to patrol specific areas and then alert an operator by radio if they find something suspicious. They have loudspeakers and microphones for questioning intruders and the operator can pick from a variety of languages.

A human always is in the loop because the military doesn't want to give machines complete discretion, said Walter Waltz, chief of robotic research for the Air Force Research Laboratory at Tyndall.

Jimenez said he found the laptop controls easy to use.

``If somebody that uses PlayStation or X-Box, that type of thing, it's right up their alley,'' Jimenez said.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; eglinafb; guard; miltech; robot; sentry; usaf

1 posted on 06/27/2004 7:26:31 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Ping!


2 posted on 06/27/2004 7:27:16 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

With this new toy, finding Sarah Conner should be a snap...


3 posted on 06/27/2004 7:37:35 PM PDT by McCloud-Strife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
We have UAV's for air superiority, and now robots for land superiority.
Dolphins guard the waterways, and robot mini subs patrol the oceans.
The man is out, and that is a good thing.
4 posted on 06/27/2004 7:39:57 PM PDT by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Connor? Sarah Connor?


5 posted on 06/27/2004 7:41:32 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"A human always is in the loop because the military doesn't want to give machines complete discretion"

If we had those when I was growing up I probably wouldn't be alive. We Air Force brats loved exploring places and things we weren't supposed to. One night we went looking for a nuclear bomb and got caught outside the war room at the B52 field house.

6 posted on 06/27/2004 8:49:43 PM PDT by bayourod (Can the 9/11 Commission connect the dots on Iraq or do they require a 3-D picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
One night we went looking for a nuclear bomb and got caught outside the war room at the B52 field house.

That wasn't in Plattsburgh, was it?

7 posted on 06/27/2004 9:10:37 PM PDT by kitchen (Over gunned? Hell, that's better than the alternative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kitchen
No, Amarillo. APs weren't allowed to physically touch dependents. We could lie down in the street and they couldn't drag us off. But these robots may not be too concerned about being court marshaled for shooting a drunk teen.
8 posted on 06/27/2004 9:22:01 PM PDT by bayourod (Can the 9/11 Commission connect the dots on Iraq or do they require a 3-D picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

When I was at Peterson AFB back in the 70s we caught a dependant kid (about 14YO) throwing M-80s in the latrine toilets. He said we couldn't touch him, and he was a Colonel's soon. AFTER beating him up some, we locked him in the Bay Orderly closet for about 3 hours. When we let him out, he took off running. Never heard from any Colonel and never saw the brat hanging around the barracks again, either.


9 posted on 06/27/2004 9:33:07 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Above. Should be Colonel's son.


10 posted on 06/27/2004 9:34:21 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

You got to get a ping list going...ping me next time 'round.


11 posted on 06/27/2004 9:41:23 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Re #11

Sure. You will be on.:)

12 posted on 06/27/2004 9:43:45 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
"The man is out, and that is a good thing."

Welcome to the end of history and the rise of the machines.

13 posted on 06/27/2004 9:52:29 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Like I said, thanks to this new robot, finding Sarah Conner Should be a snap

14 posted on 06/27/2004 10:20:31 PM PDT by McCloud-Strife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
"we caught a dependant kid (about 14YO) throwing M-80s in the latrine "

Dumb, unimaginative and destructive. No class. Must have been from a divorced family and only spent Summers with daddy.

The brats I grew up with were military junkies. We spent time at boneyards like civilian kids spent at pick-a-part. Morbid really, because some planes were from crashes. We knew what crashes meant.

15 posted on 06/27/2004 10:26:46 PM PDT by bayourod (Can the 9/11 Commission connect the dots on Iraq or do they require a 3-D picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: McCloud-Strife

Like I said only this time with illustration, finding Sarah Conner, piece of cake


16 posted on 06/27/2004 10:30:14 PM PDT by McCloud-Strife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson