Posted on 06/22/2004 4:21:11 PM PDT by swilhelm73
Fair point from a reader (I was merely trying to engage Calabresi's argument on its own terms):
C'mon Jonah! Extra-judicial means? The Supreme Court of the United States "intervened" when a lower court clearly contravened law, convention and the Constitution of Florida. The Supreme Court did nothing, except enforce status quo. Fie on even allowing that much of the judge's argument. (I agree with everything else you said, though.)
Is this a fragment? It makes no sense. Could you please post something that makes sense.
Ditto!
It's obviously a comment on a commentator's lingering resentment of Gore's loss in 2000.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.