Posted on 06/22/2004 12:46:12 AM PDT by kattracks
June 22, 2004 -- A 13-year-old girl was raped by her father and her two brothers in two separate attacks in their Brooklyn apartment, law-enforcement sources said yesterday. The names of the girl and her alleged attackers were withheld to protect her identity.The rapes took place in May and June in the family's apartment on Blake Avenue in Brownsville, sources said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Family Love That Dare Not Speak Its Name. Film at 11.
(how do I turn off the snide remark key again?)
Nam Vet
Not trying to start a fight, I just don't understand.
Raping a daughter and a sister? This is sick, even by the standards of these morally elastic times that we live in.
Of course this is Bush's fault.
(sarcasm off)
Some liberal defense attorney is going to make these monsters saints and blame the girl for asking for it. Never mind its statutory rape. Every one is a victim these days.
Just how many of Clinton's relatives followed him to the northeast, anyway? That is way grotesque!
"And tune in to our next episode of 'As the Stomach Turns.'"
This case will most likely be plea bargained down to a couple of misdemeanor sexual imposition charges.
The minor males will go to a Juvenal hall where they will get therapy 4 times a week.
The Father will get six months in a state pen and several years of mandatory therapy during a parole period.
The father will also lose all parental rights to all of his children.
The state will raise all of the children to be good little robots. The father and brothers will enter the revolving door justice system of sexual predators.
The title is exactly as it appears in the Post. And I don't know why the quotes are there either. I am finding it an unnecessary and offensive bit of "editorializing".
"Any idea which one of our 'multicultures' could perpetrate such an assault?"
Blake Avenue in Brownsville is 100% black.
You mean, the one where it's always the girl who gets the death penalty if anyone finds out?
Not enough evidence to say, and we may not get much more.
What I often do in this situation is to put the phrase "[sic]" after the word or phrase in question, to show that I am repeating accurately an inaccurate or incorrect spelling or usage.
Once my wife was quoting, in writing, a written comment by the top person at her organization. But that written comment by the top person had a mistake in usage. I wanted her to use [sic] but for some reason she opposed the idea.
Why would the Post be implying that 'rape' is an incorrect usage of the word in this case?
Ahhhhhhh... they don't mention the race of the suspects. There you have it. More media bias.
They are most likely Black (seeing that Brownsville is an African American community). But so what? Ethnicity is a non-issue.
Aren't white suspects routinely mentioned? Its like Republican and Democrat. You know when a particular tag is missing from a story, its like the dog in the Arthur Conan Doyle story that didn't bark. And which is significant all on its own.
>>brothers in two separate attacks in their Brooklyn apartment,<<
Who was 1st, the kids or Dad? Where was Mom?
You see it all depends on what your definition of "rape" is.
/malicious snicker
Sounds like something you'd hear about in the middle east.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.