Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asmith92008

The journal editors also espouse the view that the population of the United States should be about 1 billion people, and they don't care how they get here or if they do it legally.

So whatever they write you can bet its going to support a massive influx of population in the United States by any means.


12 posted on 06/17/2004 9:49:49 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer
"The journal editors also espouse the view that the population of the United States should be about 1 billion people,"

What's wrong with that? It would solve our social security crises for a few more decades. There's plenty of room.

Are you a follower of that radical ZPG advocate Donald Huddle? I remember having to read a book in college entitled "The Population Bomb" that expressed the prevailing opinion of most intellectuals.

Among other things it said that by the year 2000 we would be so crowded that single family residences would no longer exist; that there would be insufficient food to allow the inefficient consumption of meat (we'd all be eating soy beans), and that based upon studies of overcrowded rats we'd all be homosexual (didn't have gays back then).

When I fly over America, all I see are forests and farms. Last I checked the government was still spending billions on farm subsidies because overproduction of food is a big problem.

20 posted on 06/17/2004 11:26:17 PM PDT by bayourod (Can the 9/11 Commission connect the dots on Iraq or do they require a 3-D picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson