Posted on 06/17/2004 2:34:38 PM PDT by doug from upland
Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Miss America 1982, told the Toronto Sun on September 17, 1998, that Clinton had threatened her and her family and had her house staked out. She said she feared for her life. On NBC's Dateline, Gracen admitted that she had had sex with Clinton but tried to stay out of the US for fear of Clinton. Her story is evolving - she told the Toronto Sun, "I couldn't have told you this a month ago." Her hotel room has been ransacked by someone who left a Rolex watch and two thousand dollars alone. A friend told Jones lawyers that Elizabeth had broken down in tears in the mid-1980s when she talked of the incident with Clinton. Judy Stokes said Gracen was in tears when she described Clinton's approach in the back seat of a limo and revealed that the sex they had was something Gracen "did not want to happen." Gracen told Michael Isakoff of Newsweek (see his book UNCOVERING CLINTON) that Clinton had severely bitten her lip. She revealed that long before the Broaddrick interview and it is documented in his new book. Gracen had been married at the time. Gracen has steadfastly avoided testifying under oath about it. If she says it was consensual, why does she avoid saying that under oath? What's the problem?
The White House reaction to Gracen's Dateline interview is interesting. If they were so worried that she would finger Clinton in a consensual relationship, taking the extraordinary measure of surveiling her every move -- then why the nonchalant reaction when Gracen finally said the encounter was consensual? (as opposed to trashing her as they had every other woman from Flowers to Jones) The logical inference is that they were afraid she would say something else.
(When Clinton admits to raping women, the feminists will decide he is entitled to one free rape per.)
She fingered him...?
bump!
What a swine!
I'll bet Juanita won't be there either.
Has any gotten a pre-publication preview of the book? I bet he sticks only to "policy" and the political aspects, not personal aspects of his life. He'll probably have a lot to say about the impeachment fight, but not the reasons behind the articles of impeachment themselves.
Clinton is a sociopath, a liar, and a rapist.
And any one of those many, many things is major bad, screw up your karma, guilt trip for life material.
The thing that keeps coming back to me is that he got away with it. ALL of it.
I feel all sorts of empathy for the people who were on the receiving end of the Clinton evil and how they must feel when he not only gets away with it, ALL of it, he prospers. Where is the justice?
He is such a tool of evil (or an evil tool, you make the call) walking amongst us that I question my faith. How is it that he is exempt the golden rule and karma and all of that???
900 FBI dossiers, that's how.
Ain't it the truth. That's the way of the Clinton crime family.
ladies?
How's your blood-pressure?
Doug, you would have been pleased with Fred Barnes on today's roundtable.
He reminded viewers that there were many women Clinton was associated with, not just Monica (the implicatoin she was it has been driving me nuts), and Fred also added names and said some Clinton was accused of raping.
He was very blunt.
Today, DFU has posted at least a dozen threads on what isn't in this bloody book.
I am beginning to wonder if it is a blank journal with a fancy book-jacket!
At the moment, Prout, I have so many problem that Clintoon doesn't even BEGIN to register.
He's trash.
Not a dozen threads, but several. I will put up more. America has to realize that his book is crap. Nothing but lying crap.
Well, okay. Maybe I exagerated. ;-)
I wouldn't use it to prop an uneven table!
my lies by scumbag rapist
Good for Fred.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.