Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Space Exploration Report Released
Universe Today ^ | 6/16/04

Posted on 06/16/2004 5:23:45 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Logo

New Space Exploration Report Released


Summary - (Jun 16, 2004) When President Bush announced his new space exploration plan earlier this year, he tasked a special committee to figure out the best way to implement. After several months of research, including public forums and feedback from a wide range of space experts, the committee has released its findings in a 64-page document. The report contains eight findings and fourteen recommendations on how to implement the vision, which emphasizes the importance of a vibrant space exploration industry.

Full Story -

On January 14, 2004, President George W. Bush announced a new vision for America’s civil space program that calls for human and robotic missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. This vision set forth goals of: returning the Space Shuttle safely to flight; completing the International Space Station (ISS); phasing out the Space Shuttle when the ISS is complete (about 2010); sending a robotic orbiter and lander to the Moon; sending a human expedition to the Moon as early as 2015, but no later than 2020; conducting robotic missions to Mars in preparation for a future human expedition; and conducting robotic exploration across the solar system. Such a focus for the American space program has not existed since the Apollo era and establishes a much-needed direction and purpose for our national space efforts.

While discovery is the goal of space exploration, the Commission is certain that the benefits here on Earth will make the journey at least as important as the destination.

The long-term, ambitious space agenda advanced by the President for robotic and human exploration will significantly help the United States protect its technological leadership, economic vitality, and security. This ambitious path of exploration and the achievements made along the way will inspire the nation’s youth, yield scientific breakthroughs, create high technology jobs, improve our industrial competitiveness, demonstrate America’s leadership, and improve prosperity and the quality of life for all Americans.

To sustain this program over many Presidential Administrations and Congressional sessions, our leaders must routinely explain and demonstrate the value, affordability, and credibility of the program to all Americans so that they accept ownership of it. The President has projected the annual resources available to NASA at roughly the same level as in the past, growing only slightly in the coming years. Within these annual levels, the journey will need to be managed within available resources using a “go as you can pay” approach, which allows specific exploration goals to be adjusted as technology advances and periodic milestones are achieved.

Successful implementation of the national space exploration vision will require significant cultural and organizational changes in the federal government’s approach to managing the effort, and bold transformation initiatives must be undertaken. The Commission has developed the following findings and recommendations for a sustainable, affordable, and credible program:

  • The space exploration vision must be managed as a significant national priority, a shared commitment of the President, Congress, and the American people. The Commission recommends:

    • The President establish a permanent Space Exploration Steering Council, reporting to the President, with representatives of all appropriate federal agencies, and chaired by the Vice President or such other senior White House executive that the President may designate. The council shall be empowered to develop policies and coordinate work by its agencies to share technologies, facilities, and talent with NASA to support the national space exploration vision.

  • NASA’s relationship to the private sector, its organizational structure, business culture, and management processes – all largely inherited from the Apollo era – must be decisively transformed to implement the new, multi-decadal space exploration vision. The Commission recommends:

    • NASA recognize and implement a far larger presence of private industry in space operations with the specific goal of allowing private industry to assume the primary role of providing services to NASA, and most immediately in accessing low-Earth orbit. In NASA decisions, the preferred choice for operational activities must be competitively awarded contracts with private and non-profit organizations and NASA’s role must be limited to only those areas where there is irrefutable demonstration that only government can perform the proposed activity;

    • NASA be transformed to become more focused and effectively integrated to implement the national space exploration vision, with a structure that affixes clear authority and accountability;

    • NASA Centers be reconfigured as Federally Funded Research and Development Centers to enable innovation, to work effectively with the private sector, and to stimulate economic development. The Commission recognizes that certain specific functions should remain under federal management within a reconfigured Center;

    • the Administration and Congress work with NASA to create 3 new NASA organizations:
      • a technical advisory board that would give the Administrator and NASA leadership
      • independent and responsive advice on technology and risk mitigation plans;
      • an independent cost estimating organization to ensure cost realism and accuracy; and
      • a research and technology organization that sponsors high risk/high payoff
      • technology advancement while tolerating periodic failures; and

    • NASA adopt proven personnel and management reforms to implement the national

      • space exploration vision, to include:
      • use of “system-of-systems” approach;
      • policies of spiral, evolutionary development;
      • reliance upon lead systems integrators; and
      • independent technical and cost assessments.

  • The successful development of identified enabling technologies will be critical to attainment of exploration objectives within reasonable schedules and affordable costs. The Commission recommends:

    • NASA immediately form special project teams for each enabling technology to:
      • conduct initial assessments of these technologies;
      • develop a roadmap that leads to mature technologies;
      • integrate these technologies into the exploration architecture; and
      • develop a plan for transition of appropriate technologies to the private sector.

    • Sustaining the long-term exploration of the solar system requires a robust space industry that will contribute to national economic growth, produce new products through the creation of new knowledge, and lead the world in invention and innovation. This space industry will become a national treasure. The Commission recommends:

      • NASA aggressively use its contractual authority to reach broadly into the commercial and nonprofit communities to bring the best ideas, technologies, and management tools into the accomplishment of exploration goals; and
      • Congress increase the potential for commercial opportunities related to the national space exploration vision by providing incentives for entrepreneurial investment in space, by creating significant monetary prizes for the accomplishment of space missions and/or technology developments and by assuring appropriate property rights for those who seek to develop space resources and infrastructure.

    • International talents and technologies will be of significant value in successfully implementing the space exploration vision, and tapping into the global marketplace is consistent with our core value of using private sector resources to meet mission goals. The Commission recommends:

      • NASA pursue international partnerships based upon an architecture that would encourage global investment in support of the vision.

    • Implementing the space exploration vision will be enabled by scientific knowledge, and will enable compelling scientific opportunities to study Earth and its environs, the solar system, other planetary systems, and the universe. The Commission recommends:

      • NASA seeks routine input from the scientific community on exploration architectures to ensure that maximum use is made of existing assets and emerging capabilities;
      • NASA ask the National Academy of Sciences to engage the scientific community in a re-evaluation of priorities to exploit opportunities created by the space exploration vision. In particular, the community should consider how machines and humans, used separately and in combination, can maximize scientific returns; and
      • a discovery-based criterion to select destinations beyond the Moon and Mars that also considers affordability, technical maturity, scientific importance, and emerging capabilities including access to in-situ space resources.

    • The space exploration vision offers an extraordinary opportunity to stimulate mathematics, science, and engineering excellence for America’s students and teachers – and to engage the public in a journey that will shape the course of human destiny. The Commission recommends:

      • The Space Exploration Steering Council work with America’s education community and state and local political leaders to produce an action plan that leverages the exploration vision in support of the nation’s commitment to improve math, science, and engineering education. The action plan should:
        • increase the priority on teacher training;
        • provide for better integration of existing math, science, and engineering education initiatives across governments, industries, and professional organizations; and
        • explore options to create a university-based “virtual space academy” for training the next generation technical work force.
      • Industry, professional organizations, and the media engage the public in understanding why space exploration is vital to our scientific, economic, and security interests.

The Commission unanimously endorses this ambitious yet thoroughly achievable goal of space exploration. This will require a steady commitment from current and future Administrations, Congresses, and the American people. Reasonable risk must be accommodated, along with some failures. Our journey will require the government to embrace fundamental changes in its management and organization. This exploration vision must be discovery driven – and it must certainly necessitate placing greater reliance on the private sector. We should take advantage of this unique opportunity to inspire our youth, motivate our teachers and improve math, science, and engineering education for our future workforce. In fact, we must do all of these things to succeed.

Original Source: President's Commission Report (2.17 MB PDF document)



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; exploration; goliath; president; report; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2004 5:23:45 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

They mention private property rights. Like everything else in the report they just say that something ought to be done about private property rights or there will be no private development in space. They say that the Treaty disallows sovereignty over celestial resources, but that is incorrect since the signatiries assert sovereignty by merely signing.


2 posted on 06/16/2004 5:28:02 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Space ping.


3 posted on 06/16/2004 5:35:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Hey there RW


You might find John Kerrys comments on the Bush vision for space to be interesting. To me they appeared to be nothing more than the standard political double speak, misrepresentations, and unanswered questions.

http://space.com/news/kerry_report_040616.html


4 posted on 06/16/2004 5:39:48 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Thanks, already commented on Kerry's comments. He didn't attract my vote on that one. Does not make the grade, sorry.


5 posted on 06/16/2004 5:41:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

ping


6 posted on 06/16/2004 5:43:47 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Do you not think that in time this has to be sprung on the World as a fiat accompli? Let's get up there first, then make it an American Rock. If we starrted cebating with the UN now it will never get off the ground. Certainly this is much better then the current situation.
7 posted on 06/16/2004 5:46:32 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

No debate is necessary. Any signatory can withdraw from the treaty by invoking section ten, I think, and waiting one year. All of outer space is already under sovereignty by everyone, so we'll withdraw from the treaty and then fight it out the old-fashioned way--lawsuits.


8 posted on 06/16/2004 5:50:22 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

They just need to get out of Burt Rutan's way. I've often thought of him as a modern-day John Galt. He sure fits the mold.


9 posted on 06/16/2004 6:00:04 PM PDT by Noumenon (Ronaldus Magnus - only lesser men have followed in his footsteps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Yes but our liberals will make a stink. I have spoken to you on this and well remember your history and respect your position. I still think that Bush's approach is quite laudable and would like to see it implemented. You know as well as I do the the Rats will try to sandbag it out of their inclination toward the perverse. They have politicized it to a degree all ready. Better to get started and worry about the rest later.

In the end I do not think it will be settled in courts but by war. We should aim to make the moon US territory. I might take a hundred years but that should be our goal.

10 posted on 06/16/2004 6:09:55 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; *Space; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; ...
It is a good start. As for property rights in space it has to be addressed. As for Kerry, if he wins forget about it. Kerry is more let just keep NASA but cut the budget and let other nations go past us in space exploration. Bush space gave me the final reason why I'm voting for Bush this election....

Space Ping! This is the Space Ping List! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
11 posted on 06/16/2004 6:11:49 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Just read them, they are pathetic oppions. What a arroragent self important !ass that man is. What a disaster he will be if he ever gets in. Bush's plan is much better. He needs to go out and fight for it and counter Kerry's position. The proble is that his plan, while not radical at all to anyone that has deal with the DoD from the private sector side, needs to be clearly explained to the American people. Bush as eveidently refrained from pushing this as a campaign issue, perhaps he should rethink this one.


12 posted on 06/16/2004 6:15:25 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

That is just what clinton wanted: partiy with the EU. These people truly hate this nation.


13 posted on 06/16/2004 6:16:25 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

From what I understand, during the Clinton admin... Any talks about a human mission to Mars was forbidden.


14 posted on 06/16/2004 6:30:22 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Anything above LEO was forbidden. We were kept in a holding pattern in order to let the ESA catch up with us.

Our space policy is as important as our attitude toward our Navy.

Nothing better illustrates the treason of the Democrats than the Space policies of the 90's.

15 posted on 06/16/2004 6:37:46 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
That has been the Democrats policies since the moon landing. Actually it was:
1. The Nixon Administration
2. The Carter Admin
3. The Clinton Admin
4. Carl Sagan
5. Liberals
6. Yes some consertivites.
Am I'm missing something?
16 posted on 06/16/2004 6:54:50 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Am I'm missing something?

"Some conservatives perhaps... ;-)

I think I might use this report as an assignment for my class -- have the students dig through it to find the biggest technical hurdles, driving requirements, and potential show-stoppers. Could be interesting.

17 posted on 06/16/2004 7:03:56 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

what if we find dilithium crystals? do we get the rights to those? with our luck, we'll probably only find a storage compartment full of tribbles and grain.


18 posted on 06/16/2004 7:06:03 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Wishy washy crap, ain't it? Property rights will have to be guaranteed somehow. As far as I'm concerned, giving the UN or the World Court any jurisdiction in the matter is out of the question.

Probably the best model comes from the Age of Exploration: Countries can claim territory if they get there first and assign property rights according to their laws up to some vaguely defined frontier. Beyond the frontier, chaos and might makes right. This ought to work out fine if America gets there first. That's why we have to get there first, imho! :-)

19 posted on 06/16/2004 9:56:37 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Wishy washy crap, ain't it? Property rights will have to be guaranteed somehow. As far as I'm concerned, giving the UN or the World Court any jurisdiction in the matter is out of the question.

Then write your congressman!

20 posted on 06/17/2004 2:12:14 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson