Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

I think we should pause a bit before doing anything, but am now in the keep Hamilton camp.

I agree....dump Grant. I would not be cool with dropping Andrew Jackson though.


8 posted on 06/11/2004 12:27:16 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas

Yeah, I like the higher circulation of 20s, and I have no problem dumping Jackson (not out of spite, just a basic disregard), but Grant is probably a fairer choice (what's the argument for keeping him?), and honestly, the 50 is probably more proportionate choice. And besides, Reagan had a great economic policy. A 50 is a fine choice. I can leave the 20 alone. But dont dump Hamilton. He was the FIRST EVER Sec of the Treasury--George Washington's Sec of the Treasury. Surely that gets a guy on a bill, don't you think? And that's just part of his record.


10 posted on 06/11/2004 12:33:18 PM PDT by Huck (We miss you Ronnie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

I wouldn't mind dumping Grant, but I'm curious why you are loyal to Andrew Jackson. Would you care to elaborate?


12 posted on 06/11/2004 12:34:29 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson