To: Cableguy
The fact that there isn't a separate category called Abject Failure and Total Disgrace with the name of William Jefferson Clinton means this list is without merit.
Reagan should be in the top three, IMHO.
And what the hell is Woodrow Wilson doing so high?
To: bigeasy_70118
Remember, this is a survey of historians, many of whom are liberal.
8 posted on
06/10/2004 9:01:20 AM PDT by
Cableguy
To: bigeasy_70118
"And what the hell is Woodrow Wilson doing so high?"
Years ago either the American Specator or National Review had their own ranking of the Presidents. They had Wilson as a failure.
21 posted on
06/10/2004 9:05:01 AM PDT by
KJacob
(No military in the history of the world has fought so hard and so often for the freedom of others.)
To: bigeasy_70118
And what the hell is Woodrow Wilson doing so high? With liberal historians intentions are what counts.
To: bigeasy_70118
And what the hell is Woodrow Wilson doing so high?Historians love big government.
52 posted on
06/10/2004 9:16:55 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." ...Ronald Reagan, 1981)
To: bigeasy_70118
how did FDR get so high???
72 posted on
06/10/2004 9:22:49 AM PDT by
Coroner
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson