The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.
Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.
To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
(Mia, you AMAZE me!)
"the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints,"
As it should be. The Supremes (at least two of them) want the U.S. Courts rule according to "International Law" and John Kerry who would instantly hand sovereignty of the U.S. over to the UN and probably dismantle our military and put us under UN control
"and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine."
Which I don't think is a bad thing considering that doctrine is anti-terrorism and anti-those-who-breed-or-harbor-terrists. And, that doctrine is freedom and liberty to brutally oppressed countries lie Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea just to name a few.
The "Bush doctrine" is not bad doctrine in my opinion.
I hope this Soros character runs out of money, is found guilty of something and and is jailed or perhaps his plane will suffer engine failure or something...
The Soros ThreatThe Capitalist Threat
(1997 article by Soros)