Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
thank you. if you goto the links under the" finger" graphic, you will see a bunch of virtual characters: hillary, bill, more kerry, gore, pelosi, kennedy...

I use various 3D modeling, 2D illustration+painting, and lip-sinc software, as well as Flash.

Regarding your tag line:

The time has come to address the real root cause of suicide bombing: incitement by certain religious and political leaders.

In Love With Death
(Dershowitz Explicitly Nails Islamofascism As "A Culture of Death")

The Guardian (UK)| 6/4/04 | Alan Dershowitz

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they seek to aid and abet.

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
Mia T, 5.15.04


 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 5.15.04

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.

--Elizabeth Rickard

 

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....

Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....

There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.

Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one,
(as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they seek to aid and abet.


also:
sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation


9 posted on 06/04/2004 3:36:29 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T

That is awesome..Yeah my tagline, to me the whole war on terror can be explained in that one line alone; no protests against terrorism. Instead of getting on terrorists ass, the left decided to embolden them with their "record breaking" protests here and in Europe last year, and the constant hounding and screaming over Bush. If you`ll remember last year (Feb 2003) there were rumors that Saddam might consider stepping down or going into exile, then the Euroweenies held the mass 'anti-war' protest after which Saddam told the UN to shove it and denied he was stepping down. It never occurs to them that part of the reason (if not the entire reason) we are at war now is directly because of them constantly emboldening a tyrant not to mention terrorism of which they are still doing to this day everyday. Imagine after 911 if they had mass protests asking Saddam to step down, mass protests against terror, if they put tremendous pressure on terrorism, on Saddam, if the liberals here and the Euroweenies in toilet world put out the message of 'enough is enough', 36 years of global terror ENOUGH! 12 years of breaking UN resolutions, 30 years of torture and genocide ENOUGH! It would be a comepletely different story from today, but nooooooo....We must have mass demonstrations of support for the terrorist, mass demonstrations of support for the psychotic tyrant! America is after oil! This is American imperialism! Aru Gharib! America is evil! (To liberals, terrorist humiliation in a prison is far worse than 36 years of global terror far worse than 30 years of torture, oppression and genocide) I find it very ironic that very same liberals who are screaming now about our soldiers being killed are the very same liberals who emboldened the killers to stand up and pull the trigger.


17 posted on 06/04/2004 5:37:31 AM PDT by stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims (I`m still waiting for the protests against terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson