Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Houston Judge To Decide Same-Sex Divorce Case; Transgender Male Declared Female By Texas Court
Click2Houston.com ^ | 6.2.04

Posted on 06/02/2004 11:30:09 PM PDT by ambrose

Click2Houston.com

Houston Judge To Decide Same-Sex Divorce Case Transgender Male Declared Female By Texas Court

POSTED: 5:34 p.m. CDT June 2, 2004 UPDATED: 5:39 p.m. CDT June 2, 2004

HOUSTON -- A judge began hearing what could be considered one of Houston's most unique divorce cases Wednesday. The lawsuit seeks to end the marriage of two women, one of whom was once a man.

Transgender Testifies In Same-Sex Divorce Case

It began when a Texas court declared a transgender man to be woman, and she then legally married another woman in Nevada.

Linda Gail Carter, 60, is asking state Family Court Judge Lisa Millard to void her marriage to Constance Gonzales.

Carter said she first realized she was a female when she was 6 years old and known as James Murphy.

After undergoing procedures to make her physically a woman, Carter had her gender legally declared to be female, and got a Texas driver's license with her new name.

Carter married Gonzales on Oct. 31, 1998 in Las Vegas.

But Carter said the marriage went sour in 2002 after she said Gonzales committed fraud and stole more than $500,000 from a funeral home business.

Carter is suing Gonzales to end the marriage and to seek damages.

Carter believes that since Texas does not recognize same-sex marriages, the judge should void the union.

But in court, Gonzales' attorney presented numerous documents that showed Carter presented herself as James Murphy even after the legal name change.

The judge asked Carter on the stand, "Yes or no -- I want to know, are you a male or female?"

"According to the doctors, I'm both," Carter testified.

Judge Millard then told Carter's attorney, "If you are willing to say your client is a male, then you can go on and get this divorce."

Carter's attorney, Elsi Martin-Simon, said, "That's for my client to say."

Carter never answered.

A gag order prevents both attorneys from commenting on Wednesday's testimony.

The trial resumes Thursday.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: genderiddisorder; homosexualagenda; prisoners

Linda Gail Carter

1 posted on 06/02/2004 11:30:10 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Eek! Whatever it is, it's ugly as sin!


2 posted on 06/02/2004 11:38:19 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

This mentally ill man married a woman. This is just a divorce of a man from a woman.

Transgendered is a mental illness which is treated by mutilation plastic surgery. There is no same sex here.

Even the ADA does not recognize transgendered as a disability.

There is the texas divorce case where the texas attorney general intervened on a judges mistaken signing of a divorce for a civil union between two homosexuals. The judge undid his order as void as a matter of law. (IOW it could not exist at law)

This "couple" married in Nevada because one was XX and one was XY. Not because one has a certain type of mental illness.


3 posted on 06/02/2004 11:41:05 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
most unique

'unique' is an absolute. It means: there's only one.

Adding the 'most' modifier implies there are several 'unique'. Question for the journalism major that wasted my oxygen to write this stupid screed.... What is the plural of unique???!!!???

Answer?: "THERE AIN'T NONE"

Idiot journalists..... And they still don't know the difference between 'like' and 'as'.... /rant off

/john

4 posted on 06/03/2004 12:47:48 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Soy el jefe de la cocina. No disguta conmigo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Seems to me that DNA should be used to prove this sort of case.


5 posted on 06/03/2004 3:48:35 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I thought John Candy was dead ...


6 posted on 06/03/2004 6:43:55 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

I died a little inside when I saw that picture. Horrific. Like Butterbean with a mullet.


7 posted on 06/03/2004 8:02:40 AM PDT by ICX (FR's resident dumb puppy with big teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ICX

The Doctors who created this monster are supposed to know better. "He" is to be pitied, but they shouldn't be allowed to practice.


8 posted on 06/03/2004 8:15:07 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: little jeremiah
Ping


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)


Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues"

10 posted on 06/03/2004 10:13:35 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - Continuing the deluge from the Tsunami of Sewage.

Anyone think this is as bad as it's gonna get? Really?

This is the beginning of the hell we've brought upon ourselves by rejecting moral absolutes, or allowing others to reject them and not taking action a couple or three decades ago.

Now what are we going to do about it? Each of us needs to ask ourselves that.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


11 posted on 06/03/2004 10:49:15 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Take Back The Rainbow! Take back the word "GAY"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
...one of whom was once a man.

This piece of human debris was nevef a man.

12 posted on 06/03/2004 11:00:49 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
The author also writes as if it were settled, that the individual in question is a woman.

There's a real simple test for what this individual is. Have him drop his drawers in the judge's chambers. Either he has a penis and is a man, or lacks one, and is nothing. You can chop a man's penis off, and fill him full of female hormones and silicone implants, but it still won't give him ovaries and female sexual sensation.

13 posted on 06/03/2004 8:48:56 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson