Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sampley: Kerry 'Bird' Shot May Have Been Captured on Film
Newsmax ^ | 6/2/04

Posted on 06/02/2004 1:52:23 PM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: All

I don't know how anyone can doubt that he flipped the bird to Sampley. Afterall he had been over heard once using the "f" word, and remember when he thought no one would hear him and he called Hannity and Rush crooks, and when he yelled at one voter in Minnesota ? ( I think it was Minnesota)


61 posted on 06/02/2004 2:38:08 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
Why hasn't anyone else who was there come forward and either confirmed or denied it...I would think at least one "outraged parent" would have said something.

Exactly. I've had serious doubts about the truth of this story since NewsMax first reported it. IMO, Limbaugh and others should have waited for another eye witness before running with the story. It'd be outstanding if it's true and verified. If not, it hurts the credibility of those who repeat it.

62 posted on 06/02/2004 2:40:15 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
If a bona fide photo ever does show up, Lurch is toast and Hillary will be the nominee

Oh really? After Slick Willie, flipping the bird would be considered small potatoes to our media friends. Kerry already been caught saying the F word to a large group of people which is about the most vulgar thing a candidate can say and is certainly worse than flipping off someone. And the F word was on his web site and then removed.

I don't think anything short of indictment for murder could bring down Kerry or keep dems from rallying around him like some union boss.

63 posted on 06/02/2004 2:40:21 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

bubbas I.Q.


64 posted on 06/02/2004 2:42:22 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; 88keys; Akron Al; babyface00; Badray; Bikers4Bush; boxerblues; Captiva; ...
We should be so fortunate.

This guy is FUBAR, and someone should have kicked his ass a long time ago.

Note to Secret Service monitors: I am not advocating it now because of his protected status, but someone should have done it 35 years ago, and maybe he wouldn't be the self absorbed pretentious prick that he is.

Given the opportunity I would do the country a favor, but only to make his lip and nose bleed a little.

In God We Trust…..Semper Fi!

65 posted on 06/02/2004 2:42:38 PM PDT by North Coast Conservative (Better Dead Than MO-HA-MED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPrincess
If it gets out it could be pretty devastating for him.

In what way? Democrats consider disrespecting and disgracing the military to be their greatest calling. Just look at how they beamed over Clinton's "Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell" nonsense.

66 posted on 06/02/2004 2:43:56 PM PDT by Prime Choice (John Kerry is a butthead! ...or worse, a used car salesman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I've been out a few days and I was wondering if there was a thread where I could find the pics of former Pres. Bush pushing Clinton at the WWII dedication? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks


67 posted on 06/02/2004 2:44:11 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I bet The New York Post would print it.


68 posted on 06/02/2004 2:44:20 PM PDT by ShandaLear (John Kerry, the gift that keeps on giving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Remember during the 2000 Presidential race, Bush allegedly said "Ass-hole" during a speech? Well, we heard about THAT. The media covered it, covered what he was talking about, covered what he meant.

Kerry does something much much worse, and we hear diddly squat.

Just another example ....


69 posted on 06/02/2004 2:45:06 PM PDT by GOP_Initiative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Its proof this guy has no self control and it will be easy to push his buttons come debate time. Hes giving us everything we need to know to put him over the edge and flip out on TV someday.

Hail to the King Baby.

70 posted on 06/02/2004 2:48:08 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

BTTT


71 posted on 06/02/2004 2:48:44 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Initiative

He did say it, it was recorded and shown by the media dogs.

Kerry, never happen even if it exists.


72 posted on 06/02/2004 2:49:00 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Oh pleeeeeazzzeee let there be a photo!


73 posted on 06/02/2004 2:53:40 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

"If a bona fide photo ever does show up, Lurch is toast and Hillary will be the nominee."

For the last 12 years, we conservatives have always hoped for a lynch pin moment like this with Clinton, Kennedy, Byrd, Kerry and all the rest of the rats. But even when it happens, nothing happens. The rats get full coverage or no coverage of every event, depending on how the lib media sees fit. Where are the photos of Kerry falling off the bike? They exist, but they are self-censored by the lib media.

Even if the photo shows up, it will be claimed as a "photoshoped, just like the Kerry-Hanoi Jane AP photo".

We will have to defeat his stupid ass at the polls.


74 posted on 06/02/2004 2:55:45 PM PDT by HighWheeler ("Would I turn on the gas if my pal Mugsy were in there?" "Ye might rabbit, ye might." Bugs, 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Initiative

Bush did call Clymer an a-hole & Cheney said "Big Time".
That is how we got the term CLYMER for A-hole.


75 posted on 06/02/2004 2:57:29 PM PDT by Feiny (This post ain't for everybody, just the sexy freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Bill Clinton would have lost...

Al Gore almost won - despite being a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign. Even a moderately competent incumbent, with the press lying about the economy as being good (as they did for Gore), would have won if a third term were allowed. You may think your opinion polls and so on show a different story - but remember that those polls are not the same as votes, and further that people knew Clinton couldn't run again.

It's impossible for me to understand how Al Gore almost won ... but he did. Clinton would have done better than Gore - and any better at all would have been enough.
76 posted on 06/02/2004 2:57:38 PM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: clyde260

I plan to yell:
"Hey, where's your HUSBAND"?


77 posted on 06/02/2004 2:58:08 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Oh really? After Slick Willie, flipping the bird would be considered small potatoes to our media friends.

Two critical differences between the Slick Willie thing and such a photo:

1) For those who do not take the time to know what is going on (including swing voters), photos have much more impact then words.

2) Swing voters tend to be more turned off a scandal in the context of firing a sitting President rather then evaluating a candidate for President.

The dims will vote for the rats no matter what, the reasonable and well informed will vote for the pubbies. But, the perception of the largely ignorant swing voter makes the difference.

78 posted on 06/02/2004 3:01:56 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I hear what you're saying, but I don't think flipping the bird at the military -- heckler or no -- goes over the same in a post-9/11 world.


79 posted on 06/02/2004 3:07:12 PM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gorjus
How soon we forget that Bill Clinton was elected in 1992 with 43% of the popular vote, then re-elected in 1996 near the height of his popularity with less than 50% of the popular vote.

Look how much damage the Democratic Party did to itself from 1992-2000 by overestimating Bill Clinton's appeal. They never realized that the nation was sick and tired of him by the time the 2000 election rolled around. And even since he left office, every single Democratic candidate that Bill Clinton publicly supported lost against a GOP opponent -- including California governor Gray Davis, who suffered the incredible ignominy of being tossed out of office in a recall election.

My guess is that Ralph Nader would have been a stronger candidate in 2000 if Clinton were the Democratic candidate instead of Gore, because at least Gore had his idiotic "Earth in the Balance" persona to enhance his left-wing credentials.

80 posted on 06/02/2004 3:07:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson