[Cicero]

Roger Ebert is ineducable.

[Army Air Corps]

The Blivet has useful idiot pals. What do you expect from folks who blindly follow the dogma of the left. At least Moore's big wish has come true; The Communist Party of the US officially announced that it will not run a candidate for president so that they can help the DNC unseat Bush.

[prairiebreeze]

Who gives a rip about anything Ebert ejects? And why in the world take the time to write the idiot?

Sheesh

Prairie

[zencat]

Almost as frustrating as Moore's views, is the fact that his films are continually referred to as 'documentaries'.

Moore and his films are pure excrement

[TheOldRepublic]

Some day I'm gonna punch Mooore in his piehole.

[EDINVA]

A. I can't find the phrase "Bush's dawdling" in my coverage from Cannes, but I'm sure the president could have managed a calm exit without "panicking and running from the room."


Guess old Roger's got all the answers, huh? What an arrogant sob .. if this weren't on FR, I wouldn't know his opinion, and still don't care!

[WinOne4TheGipper]

Hollywood Leftist Ping!!!

Please FReepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.

[Honey West]

"Michael Moore tells the Answer Man: 'Could be. Warner Records wants to release the soundtrack. I told the lawyers if he wants his fee, we should give it to him.'"

Great. Then, Ashcroft can donate the money to a conservative cause (pro-life for example). Guaranteed to give fatboy heartburn for quite some time.

[Toskrin]

It is assumed that a director distinguished enough to head the Cannes jury is above such conflicts.

Ego, one would also assume that a politician distiguished enough to head the most powerful country in the world would be above such conflicts as well.

One doesn't have to look far back in history to see the idiocy of this statement.

[NYCVirago]

Even Ebert knows that Moore is a liar -- he called him out on his claims that only a few people booed him at the Oscars, for one. But he's willing to go along with the lies because Moore is on the same side politically as him. Here's one: Moore claims reporters clocked Bush as reading from 6 to 10 minutes. Big difference between the two -- which one is it, Mikey?

[Ghengis]

And this is the same Roger Ebert that co-wrote the script to Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. The film that is full of slurs towards "faggots" and the like.

[dfwgator]

If President Bush walked on water, Moore would say, "See, he can't swim."

[arasina]

The rotund Roger Ebert and Michael Moore are on the same eating plan:
The "Don't Carrot All for Truth, Lettuce Have Leftism" Diet

(One day they'll both have to eat their words!)

[NYCVirago]

Well of course it's a politically motivated film. That's allowed. President Bush's speeches are politically motivated, and he doesn't give lip service to views opposite his own. That's allowed, too. I must decide if a movie is good or bad, despite whether I agree or disagree with its politics.

Ebert misses the reader's point. The movies he cites aren't documentaries; Moore's movie supposedly is, even though it's nothing but an anti-Bush screed.

[Howlin]

Moore/Berg information here!



Original "research" thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1143602/posts

[Verginius Rufus]

Michael Moore seems not to have heard of Pancho Villa's raid on Columbus, New Mexico, which killed more Americans than the 1993 terrorist attack on the WTC.

Did Roger Ebert become a movie critic because he was a left-wing idiot, or did he become a left-wing idiot as a result of spending all of his time watching Hollywood flicks?